Does the Fulton technique provide a more accurate assessment of cardiac hypertrophy at autopsy compared to ventricular wall thickness or total heart weight?
The Fulton technique for isolated ventricular weights is the most reliable method for assessing cardiac hypertrophy at autopsy, whereas ventricular wall thickness is insensitive.
The total weight of the normal adult human heart as well as that of each ventricle is proportional to body size. Body weight is superior to height as a predictor of total heart and isolated ventricular weights. Ventricular wall thickness is an insensitive means of assessing ventricular hypertrophy. Heart weight is a poor predictor of isolated right ventricular mass but a slightly better predictor of isolated left ventricular mass. The only method of determining the presence or absence of hypertrophy with confidence is to use the Fulton technique for isolated ventricular weights. The use of an arbitrary upper and lower limit, as currently used, for isolated ventricular weights obtained by Fulton's method may, however lead to errors in determining the presence or absence of ventricular hypertrophy.
Hangartner et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: