PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2013Thrombosis Journal166 citationsOpen Access

Laboratory assessment of rivaroxaban: a review

MSM SamamaGCG. ContantTSTheodore E. Spiro

Key Result

Anti-Factor Xa chromogenic assays, in tandem with rivaroxaban calibrators and controls, provide the most accurate quantitative measurement of rivaroxaban plasma concentrations.

Structured PICO

How should rivaroxaban exposure be assessed in the laboratory when necessary?

I
Intervention
Laboratory assessment of rivaroxaban using anti-Factor Xa chromogenic assays

When assessment of rivaroxaban exposure is needed, anti-Factor Xa chromogenic assays can measure drug concentration, though clinicians must interpret results alongside pharmacokinetics and patient bleeding risk factors.

Limitations

  • The prothrombin time (PT) test lacks precision, particularly at low rivaroxaban concentrations.
  • The anti-Factor Xa method measures drug concentration rather than the intensity of the drug's anticoagulant activity.
  • Detailed clinical guidelines are lacking for practical aspects such as switching between anticoagulants and reversing anticoagulant effects.

Abstract

Research into new anticoagulants for preventing and treating thromboembolic disorders has focused on targeting single enzymes in the coagulation cascade, particularly Factor Xa and thrombin, inhibition of which greatly decreases thrombin generation. Based on the results of phase III clinical trials, rivaroxaban, a direct Factor Xa inhibitor, has been approved in many countries for the management of several thromboembolic disorders. Owing to its predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, fixed-dose regimens are used without the need for routine coagulation monitoring. In situations where assessment of rivaroxaban exposure may be helpful, anti-Factor Xa chromogenic assays (in tandem with standard calibration curves generated with the use of rivaroxaban calibrators and controls) could be used. It is important to note that test results will be affected by the timing of blood sampling after rivaroxaban intake. In addition, the anti-Factor Xa method measures the drug concentration and not the intensity of the drug's anticoagulant activity, and a higher than expected rivaroxaban plasma level does not necessarily indicate an increased risk of bleeding complications. Therefore, clinicians need to consider test results in relation to the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban and other patient risk factors associated with bleeding.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Samama et al. (2013) conducted a review in Thromboembolic disorders. Rivaroxaban was evaluated. Anti-Factor Xa chromogenic assays, in tandem with rivaroxaban calibrators and controls, provide the most accurate quantitative measurement of rivaroxaban plasma concentrations.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0e989b3903c9222ec8493dhttps://doi.org/10.1186/1477-9560-11-11
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Population model of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor in healthy subjects2007 · 179 citations
  2. 2Dabigatran etexilate for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: Resolving uncertainties in routine practice2012 · 219 citations
  3. 3Clot-bound thrombin is protected from inhibition by heparin-antithrombin III but is susceptible to inactivation by antithrombin III-independent inhibitors.1990 · 1,127 citations
  4. 4Accurate determination of rivaroxaban levels requires different calibrator sets but not addition of antithrombin2012 · 99 citations
  5. 5Assays for Measuring Rivaroxaban: Their Suitability and Limitations2010 · 160 citations