PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 11, 2006European Heart Journal214 citationsOpen Access

Effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on overall mortality and mode of death: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

View Full Paper
MRMáximo Rivero‐AyerzaDTDominic A.M.J. TheunsHGHéctor M. García‐García

Key Result

Cardiac resynchronization therapy alone significantly reduced all-cause mortality compared with optimal medical therapy (16.9% vs. 20.7%; OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.57-0.88) in advanced heart failure.

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=2,371)

Structured PICO

Does cardiac resynchronization therapy alone reduce overall mortality in patients with advanced heart failure compared to optimal pharmacological therapy?

P
Population
2,371 patients with advanced heart failure and depressed left ventricular systolic performance across 5 randomized controlled trials.
I
Intervention
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) alone (without a combined defibrillator function)
C
Comparator
Optimal pharmacological therapy
O
Outcome
Overall mortality (all-cause mortality)hard clinical

CRT alone (without ICD capability) significantly reduces all-cause mortality and progressive heart failure mortality in patients with advanced heart failure, but does not reduce sudden cardiac death.

Main Result

Effect estimate: OR 0.71 (95% CI 0.57-0.88)

Absolute Event Rate: 16.9% vs 20.7%

Abstract

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to improve symptoms and exercise tolerance in patients with advanced heart failure (HF). However, studies were underpowered to address its effect on overall mortality. To evaluate whether CRT alone (without a combined defibrillator function) reduces overall mortality as compared with optimal pharmacological therapy, and how it affects the mode of death in patients with advanced HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Public domain databases were systematically searched. Randomized controlled studies that evaluated the effects of CRT alone in patients with advanced HF and a depressed left ventricular systolic performance were selected for this analysis. Trials, which did not independently report data on CRT alone or had a follow-up period of less than 3 months, were excluded. Five studies were identified and analyzed. They included a total of 2371 patients, 1028 controls and 1343 CRT-treated patients. Pooled analysis demonstrated that CRT alone, as compared with optimal medical therapy, significantly reduced all-cause mortality by 29% 16.9 vs. 20.7%; odds ratio (OR), 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.57-0.88 and mortality due to progressive HF by 38% (6.7 vs. 9.7%; OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45-0.84). No effect on sudden cardiac death (SCD) was observed with CRT (6.4 vs. 5.9%; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.73-1.22). CONCLUSIONS: CRT alone as compared with optimal medical therapy reduces all-cause mortality in patients with advanced HF. It predominantly reduces worsening HF mortality, not affecting SCD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rivero‐Ayerza et al. (2006) conducted a meta-analysis in advanced heart failure (n=2,371). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) alone vs. optimal medical therapy was evaluated on all-cause mortality (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.57-0.88). Cardiac resynchronization therapy alone significantly reduced all-cause mortality compared with optimal medical therapy (16.9% vs. 20.7%; OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.57-0.88) in advanced heart failure.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f8c57d13714ec96fe4979https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehl203
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper