This review describes the clinical significance and varying clinical outcomes of the eight FDA-approved angiotensin receptor blockers used in the treatment of heart failure.
Do Angiotensin Type 1 Receptor Blockers (ARBs) reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with Heart Failure?
This review highlights the clinical significance and varying outcomes of the eight FDA-approved ARBs in the treatment of heart failure, noting their preferred use over ACEi due to better tolerability.
Homeostasis in the cardiovascular system is maintained by physiological functions of the Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System (RAAS). In pathophysiological conditions, over activation of RAAS leads to an increase in the concentration of Angiotensin II (AngII) and over activation of Angiotensin Type 1 Receptor (AT1R), resulting in vasoconstriction, sodium retention and change in myocyte growth. It causes cardiac remodeling in the heart which results in left ventricular hypertrophy, dilation and dysfunction, eventually leading to Heart Failure (HF). Inhibition of RAAS using angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) has shown to significantly reduce morbidity and mortality due to HF. ACEi have been shown to have higher drug withdrawal rates due to discomfort when compared to ARBs; therefore, ARBs are the preferred choice of physicians for the treatment of HF in combination with other anti-hypertensive agents. Currently, eight ARBs have been approved by FDA and are clinically used. Even though they bind to the same site of AT1R displacing AngII binding but clinical outcomes are significantly different. In this review, we described the clinical significance of each ARB in the treatment of HF and their clinical outcome.
Singh et al. (Wed,) conducted a review in Heart Failure. Angiotensin Type 1 Receptor Blockers (ARBs) was evaluated. This review describes the clinical significance and varying clinical outcomes of the eight FDA-approved angiotensin receptor blockers used in the treatment of heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: