Angiotensin II had no direct effect on pulmonary blood vessels or systemic vascular capacity in dogs, whereas norepinephrine acted as a pulmonary vasoconstrictor and potent venoconstrictor.
Angiotensin II vs Norepinephrine
Effects on pulmonary circulation, systemic arteries and veins, and systemic vascular capacity
In dog experiments, angiotensin II and norepinephrine were compared in regard to some components of the generalized pressor response each of these agents produces. It was found that angiotensin II has no direct effect on pulmonary blood vessels, in contrast to the pulmonary vasoconstrictor effect of norepinephrine. Angiotensin II appeared to have no effects on veins or the systemic vascular capacity, while norepinephrine was a potent venoconstrictor with, therefore, a marked ability to reduce the systemic vascular capacity.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
John C. Rose
Stanford University
Peter A. Kot
Georgetown University
Jay N. Cohn
Heart Failure & Transplant
Circulation
Georgetown University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rose et al. (Mon,) reported a other. Angiotensin II vs. Norepinephrine was evaluated on Effects on pulmonary circulation, systemic arteries and veins, and systemic vascular capacity. Angiotensin II had no direct effect on pulmonary blood vessels or systemic vascular capacity in dogs, whereas norepinephrine acted as a pulmonary vasoconstrictor and potent venoconstrictor.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1069412badbc352afff67a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.25.1.247
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: