PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 15, 1997Statistics in Medicine283 citations

Incorporating Variability in Estimates of Heterogeneity in the Random Effects Model in Meta-Analysis

View Full Paper
BBBrad J. BiggerstaffRTRichard L. Tweedie

Key Points

  • To propose a method that incorporates variability into estimates of heterogeneity in meta-analysis using random effects models.
  • Developed a form for the variance of Cochran's homogeneity statistic Q for interval estimation of tau 2.
  • Compared asymptotic likelihood methods with traditional methods for estimating heterogeneity.
  • Illustrated the new weighting scheme through two examples considering variations in study results.
  • The new weighting scheme balances between standard fixed and random effects models.
  • Large studies are down-weighted while small studies are up-weighted, adjusting for study differences.
  • Improved estimation of overall mean by accounting for variability in tau 2.

Abstract

When combining results from separate investigations in a meta-analysis, random effects methods enable the modelling of differences between studies by incorporating a heterogeneity parameter tau 2 that accounts explicitly for across-study variation. We develop a simple form for the variance of Cochran's homogeneity statistic Q, leading to interval estimation of tau 2 utilizing an approximating distribution for Q; this enables us to extend the point estimation of DerSimonian and Laird. We also develop asymptotic likelihood methods and compared them with this method. We then use these approximating distributions to give a new method of calculating the weight given to the individual studies' results when estimating the overall mean which takes into account variation in these point estimates of tau 2. Two examples illustrate the methods presented, where we show that the new weighting scheme is between the standard fixed and random effects models in down-weighting the results of large studies and up-weighting those of small studies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Biggerstaff et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10ad2c67e0c20fc6395ad4https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970415)16:7<753::aid-sim494>3.0.co;2-g
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper