PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1962The Journal of Economic History476 citations

Economic Sources of Inventive Activity

View Full Paper
JSJacob Schmookler

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The fundamental conclusion of this paper is that technological progress is intimately dependent on economic phenomena. The evidence suggests that society may indeed affect the allocation of inventive resources through the market mechanism somewhat as it affects the allocation of economic resources generally. If this is true, then technological progress is not an independent cause of socio-economic change, and an interpretation of history as largely the attempt of mankind to catch up to new technology is a distorted one. Cultural lags undoubtedly exist in social history. The automobile—to use an obvious example—rendered obsolete many pre-existing social arrangements and behavior patterns. But the reverse is also true. New goods and new techniques are unlikely to appear, and to enter the life of society without a pre-existing,—albeit possibly only latent—demand. Even a longstanding demand may have been intensified shortly before a technique to satisfy it is invented. In addition to cultural lag, there exists technological lag—a chronic tendency of technology to lag behind demand.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jacob Schmookler (1962) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a121733e407b266963435cehttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050700102311
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper