PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2018Cardiovascular Therapeutics181 citationsOpen Access

The reverse remodeling response to sacubitril/valsartan therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

View Full Paper
PMPieter MartensHBHanne BeliënMDMatthias Dupont

Key Result

Switching from a RAS-blocker to sacubitril/valsartan in HFrEF patients significantly improved LVEF (29.6% vs 34.8%; P<0.001) and reduced left ventricular volumes.

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the reverse remodeling response of sacubitril/valsartan therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
  • Single-center, prospective assessor-blinded study
  • Included 125 HFrEF patients with LVEF < 35%
  • Echocardiographic assessments performed to evaluate heart function before and after therapy initiation.
  • LVEF improved significantly from 29.6% to 34.8% (P < .001)
  • LVESV decreased from 147 mL to 129 mL (P < .001) and LVEDV decreased from 206 mL to 197 mL (P = .027)
  • Percent of patients with a restrictive mitral filling pattern decreased from 47% to 23% (P = .004).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=125)

Blinding

Single-blind

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does switching from a RAS-blocker to sacubitril/valsartan improve echocardiographic metrics of reverse remodeling in patients with HFrEF?

P
Population
125 HFrEF patients with a class I indication (NYHA class II-IV, LVEF < 35%, optimal dose with RAS-blocker), mean age 66 ± 10 years.
I
Intervention
Sacubitril/valsartan therapy, doses optimized to individual tolerance.
C
Comparator
Baseline parameters before switch (patients were on optimal dose of RAS-blocker).
O
Outcome
Reverse remodeling response assessed by echocardiographic parameters (LVEF, LVESV, LVEDV) at median 118 days follow-up.surrogate

Switching from a RAS-blocker to sacubitril/valsartan in eligible HFrEF patients induces significant reverse remodeling, improving both systolic and diastolic function.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 34.8% vs 29.6%

p-value: p=< .001

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Major classes of medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) induce reverse remodeling. The revere remodeling response to sacubitril/valsartan remains unstudied. METHODS: We performed a single-center, prospective assessor-blinded study to determine the reverse remodeling response of sacubitril/valsartan therapy in HFrEF patients with a class I indication (New York heart Association NYHA-class II-IV, Left ventricular ejection fraction LVEF < 35%, optimal dose with Renin-Angiotensin-System-Blocker RAS-blocker). Doses of sacubitril/valsartan were optimized to individual tolerance. Echocardiographic images were assessed offline by 2 investigators blinded to both the clinical data and timing of echocardiograms. RESULTS: One-hundred-twenty-five HFrEF patients (66 ± 10 years) were prospectively included. The amount of RAS-blocker before and after switch to sacubitril/valsartan was similar(P = .290), indicating individual optimal dosing of sacubitril/valsartan. Over a median(IQR) follow-up of 118(77-160) days after initiation of sacubitril/valsartan, LVEF improved (29.6 ± 6% vs 34.8 ± 6%; P < .001) and Left ventricular end-systolic (LVESV) and end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) decreased (LVESV; 147 ± 57 mL vs 129 ± 55 mL; P < .001 and LVEDV; 206 ± 71 mL vs197 ± 72 mL; P = .027). Volumetric remodeling was associated with a reduction in the degree of mitral regurgitation (1.59 ± 1.0 vs 1.11 ± 0.8; P < .001; scale from 0-4). Metrics of diastolic function improved; including a drop in the E/A-wave ratio (1.75 ± 1.13 vs 1.38 ± 0.88; P = .002) and diastolic filling time (% of cycle length) prolonged (48 ± 9% vs 52 ± 1%; P = .005). The percent of patients with a restrictive mitral filling pattern dropped from 47% to 23% (P = .004). A dose-dependent effect was noted for changes in LVEF (P < .001) and LVESV (P = .031), with higher doses of sacubitril/valsartan leading to more reverse remodeling. CONCLUSION: Switching therapy in eligible HFrEF patients from a RAS-blocker to sacubitril/valsartan induces beneficial reverse remodeling of both metrics of systolic as diastolic function.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Martens et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=125). Sacubitril/valsartan vs. RAS-blocker (baseline) was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p=< .001). Switching from a RAS-blocker to sacubitril/valsartan in HFrEF patients significantly improved LVEF (29.6% vs 34.8%; P<0.001) and reduced left ventricular volumes.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13f0062ecb6dc541893393https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-5922.12435
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Combined Endopeptidase Inhibition and Adrenomedullin in Sheep With Experimental Heart Failure2002 · 46 citations
  2. 2Eligibility of Sacubitril–Valsartan in a Real-World Heart Failure Population: A Community-Based Single-Centre Study2018 · 55 citations
  3. 3Effects of Long-term Enalapril Therapy on Cardiac Structure and Function in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction1995 · 474 citations
  4. 4Angiotensin–Neprilysin Inhibition versus Enalapril in Heart Failure2014 · 6,964 citations
  5. 5Effect of Enalapril on Survival in Patients with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fractions and Congestive Heart Failure1991 · 8,083 citations