PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 2008Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging48 citations

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessing Myocardial Viability

View Full Paper
RKRaymond Y. KwongHKHema Korlakunta

Key Result

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging serves as the reference standard for discriminating myocardial scar from viable myocardium, predicting left ventricular functional recovery and patient prognosis.

Structured PICO

Does cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging predict left ventricular functional recovery and patient prognosis in patients with chronic coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction?

P
Population
Patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular dysfunction
I
Intervention
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging
C
Comparator
Other established imaging modalities
O
Outcome
Prediction of left ventricular functional recovery and patient prognosis

CMR is a highly valuable imaging modality for assessing myocardial viability, predicting functional recovery, and determining prognosis in patients with CAD and LV dysfunction.

Abstract

Assessment of viability is pivotal to the prognosis of patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular dysfunction. Patients with viable myocardium have a better prognosis with revascularization; however, patients with nonviable myocardium have worse outcomes with higher perioperative morbidity and mortality subsequent to revascularization. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging not only is the current reference standard technique in measuring cardiac chamber size and function and myocardial mass and volume but also provides spatially registered 2- or 3-dimensional data sets in myocardial perfusion and myocardial contrast enhancement in the same imaging session. Late gadolinium enhancement by CMR is the best current technique in discriminating myocardial scar versus viable myocardium. An extensive body of preclinical evidence has validated the detection and characterization of the morphology of infarcted tissue. In clinical studies, infarct characteristics by CMR has demonstrated a strong clinical utility in the prediction of left ventricular functional recovery and patient prognosis. In this paper, we aim to review the current CMR techniques in characterizing the spectrum of myocardial changes because of CAD, in the prediction of myocardial viability, and the current evidence of CMR's role in patient prognosis. In addition, we will also review the current literature comparing the clinical utility of CMR with other established imaging modalities in the assessment of CAD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kwong et al. (2008) conducted a review in Chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular dysfunction. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging vs. Other established imaging modalities was evaluated. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging serves as the reference standard for discriminating myocardial scar from viable myocardium, predicting left ventricular functional recovery and patient prognosis.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a155121a2352da347823e3ehttps://doi.org/10.1097/rmr.0b013e31817d550c
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper