PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2001Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology52 citations

Reversible Impairment of Left and Right Ventricular Systolic and Diastolic Function During Short‐Lasting Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with an Implantable Atrial Defibrillator: A Tissue Doppler Imaging Study

View Full Paper
CYCheuk‐Man YuQWQiong WangCLChu‐Pak Lau

Key Result

Short-lasting atrial fibrillation impaired left ventricular systolic velocity at 1-minute postcardioversion compared to baseline (4.2 vs 5.7 cm/s; P<0.005), which normalized at 1 week.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=10)

Structured PICO

Does prompt cardioversion by an implantable atrial defibrillator improve ventricular systolic and diastolic function in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
10 patients (mean age 61 +/- 9 years, 8 men) with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation without structural heart disease who received an implantable atrial defibrillator (IAD).
I
Intervention
Prompt cardioversion by an implantable atrial defibrillator (IAD) following spontaneous AF episodes.
C
Comparator
Baseline sinus rhythm (within-patient comparison).
O
Outcome
Left and right ventricular systolic and diastolic function measured by echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) at 1-minute, 20-minute, 4-hour, and 1-week postcardioversion.surrogate

Short-lasting atrial fibrillation impairs systolic and diastolic function in both ventricles despite adequate rate control, but early restoration of sinus rhythm by an implantable atrial defibrillator minimizes ventricular dysfunction.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 4.2% vs 5.7%

p-value: p=< 0.005

Abstract

AF with a fast ventricular response may cause ventricular mechanical impairment, though whether short-lasting AF with satisfactory rate control may affect ventricular function is unknown. This study investigated if prompt cardioversion by an implantable atrial defibrillator (IAD) may prevent left (LV) and right ventricular (RV) systolic and diastolic dysfunction. Ten patients (mean age 61 +/- 9 years, 8 men) with paroxysmal AF without structural heart disease who received an IAD were studied by echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) for both ventricles. Measurements were made during baseline sinus rhythm and at 1-minute, 20-minute, 4-hour, and 1-week postcardioversion of an episode of spontaneous AF. The occurrence of AF and the ventricular rate were monitored at 2-hour intervals by the device. There were 50 episodes of AF with a mean duration of 8.8 +/- 8.9 days (2 hours to 37 days). There was no difference in M-mode measured LV fractional shortening and ejection fraction between baseline sinus rhythm and after cardioversion. However, the TDI derived myocardial systolic velocity (TDI-S) was significantly lower at 1-minute postcardioversion and was normalized at 1 week in both LVs (baseline: 5.7 +/- 1.8, 1 minute: 4.2 +/- 1.0, 20 minutes: 4.3 +/- 0.9, 4 hours: 4.8 +/- 1.0, 1 week: 5.5 +/- 1.8 cm/s; P 48 hours) resulted in a more depressed TDI-S in LV (> 48 hours: 4.2 +/- 1.0, < or = 48 hours: 5.3 +/- 1.3 cm/s; P < 0.01). Shocks in sinus rhythm did not affect any of the above echocardiographic parameters. Therefore, despite adequate rate control, short-lasting AF impairs systolic and diastolic function in both ventricles, which improves gradually after cardioversion. Early restoration of sinus rhythm by an IAD minimizes ventricular dysfunction. TDI is a sensitive tool to assess early systolic and diastolic dysfunction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yu et al. (2001) conducted an observational in Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=10). Cardioversion by an implantable atrial defibrillator vs. Baseline sinus rhythm was evaluated on Left ventricular myocardial systolic velocity (TDI-S) at 1-minute postcardioversion (p=< 0.005). Short-lasting atrial fibrillation impaired left ventricular systolic velocity at 1-minute postcardioversion compared to baseline (4.2 vs 5.7 cm/s; P<0.005), which normalized at 1 week.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a155c8eb2e0231f15825ceahttps://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00979.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Effect of Successful Electrical Cardioversion on Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Tissue Doppler Study2006 · 11 citations
  2. 2Late Improvement in Ventricular Performance Following Internal Cardioversion for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation:2003 · 6 citations
  3. 3Atrial Mechanical Function Before and After Electrical or Amiodarone Cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation1996 · 3 citations
  4. 4Right Heart Structure and Function after Electrical Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation2023 · 2 citations
  5. 5Post-cardioversion Improvement in LV Function Defined by 4D Flow Patterns and Energetics in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation2019 · 15 citations