Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 30, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology

Partial versus radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

KSKhaled SaedAFAnoosh FarooquiAFArham Khalid Farooq

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Systematic review and meta-analysis compares survival outcomes of nephrectomy techniques in patients with renal cell carcinoma, suggesting significant implications for surgical choices.

Key Points

  • To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma patients.
  • Systematic review of studies comparing RN and PN for RCC published till January 2026.
  • Pooled binary outcomes using the Mantel-Haenszel Random Effects model; continuous outcomes assessed with mean differences.
  • Included 45 studies with 79,417 patients undergoing either surgical approach.
  • PN significantly reduced all-cause mortality (OR = 0.63; 95% CI: [0.41, 0.96]; p < 0.0001) and cancer-specific mortality (OR = 0.45; 95% CI: [0.25, 0.81]; p < 0.0001).
  • PN improved overall survival (OR = 1.46; 95% CI: [1.14, 1.88]; p < 0.0001) compared to RN.
  • RN was associated with fewer postoperative complications (OR = 1.29; 95% CI: [1.08, 1.54]; p < 0.0001) and shorter operation time (MD = 14.15; 95% CI: [4.50, 23.81]; p < 0.0001).

Cite This Study

Saed et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a816c0307b7850943358fhttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e16551
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share