PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 30, 2026Religions0 citationsOpen Access

Meeting Vague Truths in Love: J. H. Bavinck’s Theology of Religions and Its Application to the Context of Chinese Christianity

View Full Paper
AQAdam QuibellJMJin Meng

Key Points

  • Explore Johan Herman Bavinck’s theology of religions and its implications for Chinese Christianity.
  • Text-driven analysis of Bavinck’s writings
  • Contextualization within Reformed Augustinianism
  • Application to contemporary issues in Chinese Christianity.
  • Bavinck views non-Christian religions as partial truths about God’s self-disclosure.
  • Emphasizes the need for missionary humility and judgment in confronting unbelief.
  • Connects Bavinck’s thought to modern Sino-Reformed theological discourse.

Abstract

The Neo-Calvinist Johan Herman Bavinck was one of the most significant missionaries of the mid-twentieth century in the Reformed tradition. Bavinck considered the question of the status of non-Christian religion and religious consciousness the most pressing issue for missionary thought and practice. This article offers a text-driven account of Johan Herman Bavinck’s theology of religions. It argues that Bavinck treated non-Christian religion as a culpable yet always partial suppression of God’s universal self-disclosure, in which religious systems cohere around what he calls vague truths while lacking the determinate knowledge of God given in special revelation. Attention to his distinction between systems and persons clarifies how he believed missionary encounter could combine judgement with humility, as the Christian confronts unbelief while recognising the church’s own tendency toward pseudo-religion. The article situates Bavinck’s account within Reformed Augustinianism and eclecticism, such as in the use of Freudian psychology in exegesis. It then provides a preliminary application of Bavinck’s thought to select issues in Chinese Christianity as part of recent scholarly attention to the prospects of Sino-Reformed theology.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Quibell et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a82640307b785094340d5https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17060653
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper