PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1989Applied Psycholinguistics35 citations

Toward understanding the problem in severely disabled readers Part 1: Vowel errors

View Full Paper
SBSusan E. BrysonJWJanet F. Werker

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This experiment examined the vowel responses of severely disabled readers and normal control children in reading orthographically regular nonwords. The disabled readers were divided into three groups based on their relative Verbal and Performance IQs. Following the rationale of Fowler, Shankweiler, and Liberman (1979), vowel responses were classified as incorrect or correct. Correctness was determined according to either context-free or context-dependent criteria. The main finding was that the vowel responses of two out of three reading disabled groups paralleled those of their reading level peers. However, disabled readers with higher Performance than Verbal IQs made significantly more context-free responses and significantly fewer context-dependent responses than all other groups. Moreover, knowledge of how speech is segmented at the phonemic level predicted performance on the reading task. The findings suggest that disabled readers employ very local (context-independent) strategies in reading; these findings are discussed in terms of the idea that disabled readers suffer a basic deficit in phonological processing (Liberman, Liberman, & Mattingly, 1980) or linguistic processing (Siegel & Ryan, 1984).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bryson et al. (1989) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a9476739ab56a9085af47https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716400008389
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The development of grapheme-phoneme correspondence in normal and dyslexic readers1980 · 365 citations
  2. 2Reading disabilities : the interaction of reading, language, and neuropsychological deficits1981 · 101 citations
  3. 3Relative frequency of English spellings1970 · 31 citations
  4. 4Word recognition processes of poor and disabled readers: Do they necessarily differ?1985 · 56 citations
  5. 5Reading for meaning and reading for sound in autistic and dyslexic children1983 · 506 citations