PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 2, 2019Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives3 citationsOpen Access

Best duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation: an updated network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

View Full Paper
MBMahmoud BarbarawiBKBabikir KheiriYZYazan Zayed

Structured PICO

Does a longer duration of DAPT (24-48 months) reduce MACE compared to shorter durations (3-6 or 12 months) in patients after DES implantation?

P
Population
16 RCTs pooling 42,993 patients who underwent drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, mean age 63.1 ± 10.1.
I
Intervention
Longer duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 24-48 months following DES implantation.
C
Comparator
Shorter durations of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 3-6 months or 12 months.
O
Outcome
Major adverse cardiac events (MACE)composite

A longer duration of DAPT (24-48 months) after DES implantation reduces MACE but significantly increases the risk of major bleeding compared to shorter durations (3-6 or 12 months), highlighting the need for individualized therapy.

Abstract

Background: Drug-eluting stent(DES) implantation is the main interventional treatment for coronary artery disease, and dual antiplatelet therapy(DAPT) remains the gold standard strategy to prevent ischemic events. However, the optimal duration of DAPT after DES implantation remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the best duration of DAPT following DES implantation.Method: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov for all randomized clinical trials(RCTs) that compared different durations of DAPT after DES implantation. Major adverse cardiac events(MACE) and major bleeding were the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively.Results: We included 16 RCTs (n = 42,993). The mean age of included patients was 63.1 ± 10.1. The primary outcome was statistically significant for lower MACE in patients who received DAPT for 24–48 months (mo) following DES when compared with those who received 3–6 mo of DAPT (odds ratio OR 0.75; 95% credible interval CI 0.58–0.97). There was nonstatistically significant difference in MACE when comparing those who received 12 mo of DAPT to those taking either 3–6 mo of DAPT (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.69–1.08) or 24–48 mo of DAPT (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.72–1.05). In contrast, major bleeding was significantly lower in those who received 3–6 mo of DAPT (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.17–0.54) and 12 mo of DAPT (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.27–0.63) than in those who received 24–48 mo of DAPT.Conclusion: In patients who undergo DES implantation, a longer duration of DAPT is associated with lower MACE, despite the increased risk of major bleeding events. Therefore, individualizing the duration of DAPT after DES according to the patient’s risk of bleeding and recurrent ischemia is recommended.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Barbarawi et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a9697382248a45185a10fhttps://doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2018.1562853
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper