PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2009BMC Health Services Research250 citationsOpen Access

A model to prioritize access to elective surgery on the basis of clinical urgency and waiting time

UVUmberto ValenteATAngela TestiETElena Tànfani

Key Result

The SWALIS pre-admission model provided real-time prioritization for elective surgery, protecting patients from horizontal and vertical inequities and improving the proportion of patients treated within their maximum time before treatment.

Key Points

  • This paper aims to propose a model to manage waiting lists and prioritize admissions to elective surgery based on clinical urgency and waiting time.
  • Developed through the Surgical Waiting List Info System (SWALIS) project funded by the Italian Ministry of Health in 2001.
  • Involved ten surgical units for a pre-admission process model, implemented in web-based software with modifications to Italian urgency-related groups.
  • Conducted a prospective descriptive study from March 2004 to March 2007 with real-time monitoring of waiting lists in a selected general surgery unit.
  • The SWALIS model covered a comprehensive case mix and produced real-time data for managing patient admissions.
  • Positive changes in Appropriate Performance Index (API) indicated more patients treated within their maximum time before treatment (MTBT).
  • The model enhances transparency, efficiency, and equity in managing surgical waiting lists.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=2,406)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

P
Population
2,406 patients referred to elective surgery in a single general surgery unit at S. Martino University Hospital in Genoa, Italy (1,809 ordinary and 597 day cases). Mean age 56.9 years, 63.5% female.
I
Intervention
Surgical Waiting List Info System (SWALIS) pre-admission process model, including urgency assessment into Urgency-Related Groups (URGs), assignment of Maximum Time Before Treatment (MTBT), and real-time prioritization based on urgency and waiting time.
O
Outcome
Waiting list performance indexes (average waiting time, length of the waiting list) and Appropriate Performance Index (API)

The implementation of a standardized, real-time prioritization model for elective surgery waiting lists improves transparency and the proportion of patients treated within appropriate clinical timeframes.

Limitations

  • Lack of a randomized or control group due to ethical and legal reasons
  • Absence of local comparable data prior to the model's deployment
  • Subjectivity of the clinical urgency assessment was not formally investigated with inter-rater or intra-rater reliability tools
  • Patient experience and satisfaction were not directly investigated via interviews or questionnaires
  • lack of local comparable data prior to the SWALIS model's deployment
  • risk of subjectivity in URGs assessment

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prioritization of waiting lists for elective surgery represents a major issue in public systems in view of the fact that patients often suffer from consequences of long waiting times. In addition, administrative and standardized data on waiting lists are generally lacking in Italy, where no detailed national reports are available. This is true although since 2002 the National Government has defined implicit Urgency-Related Groups (URGs) associated with Maximum Time Before Treatment (MTBT), similar to the Australian classification. The aim of this paper is to propose a model to manage waiting lists and prioritize admissions to elective surgery. METHODS: In 2001, the Italian Ministry of Health funded the Surgical Waiting List Info System (SWALIS) project, with the aim of experimenting solutions for managing elective surgery waiting lists. The project was split into two phases. In the first project phase, ten surgical units in the largest hospital of the Liguria Region were involved in the design of a pre-admission process model. The model was embedded in a Web based software, adopting Italian URGs with minor modifications. The SWALIS pre-admission process was based on the following steps: 1) urgency assessment into URGs; 2) correspondent assignment of a pre-set MTBT; 3) real time prioritization of every referral on the list, according to urgency and waiting time. In the second project phase a prospective descriptive study was performed, when a single general surgery unit was selected as the deployment and test bed, managing all registrations from March 2004 to March 2007 (1809 ordinary and 597 day cases). From August 2005, once the SWALIS model had been modified, waiting lists were monitored and analyzed, measuring the impact of the model by a set of performance indexes (average waiting time, length of the waiting list) and Appropriate Performance Index (API). RESULTS: The SWALIS pre-admission model was used for all registrations in the test period, fully covering the case mix of the patients referred to surgery. The software produced real time data and advanced parameters, providing patients and users useful tools to manage waiting lists and to schedule hospital admissions with ease and efficiency. The model protected patients from horizontal and vertical inequities, while positive changes in API were observed in the latest period, meaning that more patients were treated within their MTBT. CONCLUSION: The SWALIS model achieves the purpose of providing useful data to monitor waiting lists appropriately. It allows homogeneous and standardized prioritization, enhancing transparency, efficiency and equity. Due to its applicability, it might represent a pragmatic approach towards surgical waiting lists, useful in both clinical practice and strategic resource management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Valente et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Elective surgery waiting list (n=2,406). SWALIS pre-admission prioritization model was evaluated on Waiting list performance (waiting time, list length, Appropriate Performance Index). The SWALIS pre-admission model provided real-time prioritization for elective surgery, protecting patients from horizontal and vertical inequities and improving the proportion of patients treated within their maximum time before treatment.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c9be16050c276cfa46439https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper