This observatory note compares the Agent Atlas evidence model with official, intergovernmental, academic, civil-society, professional, private, and meta AI-governance radars. This observatory note compares the Agent Atlas evidence model with official, intergovernmental, academic, civil-society, professional, private, and meta AI-governance radars. It shows that most external monitors map laws, strategies, readiness, treaties, or bills, while the atlas maps named public agents, deployer evidence, delegated action, tool/API surfaces, trust artifacts, and source trails. The comparison identifies where external radars can strengthen country-law coverage and where agent-level evidence exposes regulatory blind spots. Rows, mappings, and examples are candidate mappings based on public evidence. They are not legal conclusions, conformity assessments, certifications, or legal advice. Companion corpus and reproducibility bundle: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20489506. Deposited artifact SHA-256: 14f169e32477c2f55bdbf25a6c9401644b2fae940afcc35814735c03fb4ea497. This Zenodo record is used as an interim public manuscript/preprint route while OSF/MetaArXiv submission awaits user-provided OSF authentication.
Anton Sokolov (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: