PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 12, 2026European Journal of Preventive Cardiology0 citationsOpen Access

Optimisation of lipid-lowering therapy in high-risk cardiovascular patients: a retrospective observational cohort study

View Full Paper
ERE RahmanJTJ TomlinsonDMD Mckenzie

Key Result

Optimisation of lipid-lowering therapy after acute coronary syndromes was associated with higher 180-day survival (100% vs 87%) and a trend toward fewer vascular events (P=0.059).

Key Points

  • To evaluate lipid follow-up, LDL-C targets, and optimisation of therapy related to clinical outcomes post-ACS.
  • Retrospective observational study of high cardiovascular risk adults discharged after ACS from a large hospital in 2024.
  • Data collected on lipid testing, LDL-C values, treatment escalation, and clinical outcomes.
  • Survival analysis conducted using Kaplan–Meier methods and Fisher’s exact test for categorical comparisons.
  • Only 12.8% underwent repeat lipid testing within four months.
  • Patients optimised for LDL-C targets showed higher survival at 180 days (100% vs 87%).
  • Follow-up patients had higher rates of vascular events (OR 3.72, 95% CI 1.09-12.71; P=0.043).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=117)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does optimisation of lipid-lowering therapy improve survival and reduce vascular events in high-risk cardiovascular patients discharged after ACS?

P
Population
117 adults at high cardiovascular risk discharged after acute coronary syndromes from a UK hospital, evaluated for lipid therapy optimisation and 180-day outcomes.
E
Exposure
Optimisation of lipid-lowering therapy (defined as achieving guideline-based targets or receiving therapy intensification)
C
Comparator
Non-optimised patients
O
Outcome
Lipid follow-up, LDL-C target attainment, optimisation of lipid-lowering therapy, and associations with 180-day clinical outcomes (survival and vascular events)hard clinical

Optimisation of lipid-lowering therapy after ACS is associated with improved short-term survival, though repeat lipid testing and treatment escalation remain infrequent in routine care.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 87%

Limitations

  • Confounding bias, as individuals perceived to be at greater risk were more frequently reassessed
  • Confounding bias (individuals perceived to be at greater risk were more frequently reassessed)

Abstract

Abstract Background High-intensity statin therapy to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduces the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events after acute coronary syndromes (ACS). UK NICE guidelines recommend the use of high-intensity statins on discharge, repeat lipid profiles within 3 months, and treatment escalation where targets are not met. Aims To evaluate lipid follow-up, LDL-C target attainment, optimisation of lipid-lowering therapy, and associations with 180-day clinical outcomes in a routine-care cohort discharged after ACS. Methods Retrospective observational study of adults coded as high cardiovascular risk discharged after ACS from a large district general hospital in 2024. Inclusion criteria of high cardiovascular risk included ACS, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), unstable angina and elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). NICE NG238 and the ESC/EAS Dyslipidaemia Guidelines served as the basis for standards. Data was extracted from a clinical information system using predefined criteria aligned with prevention guidance. Variables included repeat lipid testing, LDL-C values, treatment escalation, and vascular events. Survival was assessed using Kaplan–Meier methods, and Fisher’s exact test was applied for categorical comparisons. Subgroup analyses explored patterns of optimisation, defined as achieving guideline-based targets or receiving therapy intensification. Results A total of 117 patients met inclusion criteria. Only 15 of 117 individuals (12.8%) underwent repeat lipid testing within four months. Among those retested, 3 (20%) who did not reach NICE lipid targets (LDL-C ≤2mmol/L) were not escalated in therapy. Optimised patients demonstrated higher survival at 180 days than those not optimised (100% vs 87%). Patients who received follow-up had a higher recorded rate of vascular events (OR 3.72, 95% CI 1.09-12.71; P=0.043), likely reflecting confounding bias, as individuals perceived to be at greater risk were more frequently reassessed. A non-significant trend toward fewer vascular events was seen among optimised compared with non-optimised patients (P=0.059). Subgroup analysis showed comorbidity-specific variation in LDL-C change, with the largest reductions in chronic kidney disease (-1.2mmol/L) and minimal change in diabetes (+0.15mmol/L), a 110% relative difference. Conclusion Repeat lipid testing and treatment escalation after acute coronary syndromes were infrequent, indicating missed opportunities for secondary prevention. Optimised patients showed favourable short-term survival, supporting structured lipid-management pathways. Several interventions, including patient-held lipid passports and standardised discharge templates, were introduced to improve follow-up and standardise escalation, with prospective evaluation planned.Survival by optimisationFor image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text. LDL-C change by comorbidityFor image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rahman et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndromes (n=117). Optimisation of lipid-lowering therapy vs. Non-optimised therapy was evaluated on Survival at 180 days. Optimisation of lipid-lowering therapy after acute coronary syndromes was associated with higher 180-day survival (100% vs 87%) and a trend toward fewer vascular events (P=0.059).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2bd14e6550ea4541ffea2chttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwag249.251
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper