PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 26, 2026Periodontology 20000 citationsOpen Access

Improving periodontal regeneration outcomes with hyaluronic acid: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

View Full Paper
AAAbdusalam AlrmaliUniversity of TripoliQBQasim Omer ButtUniversity of MichiganRKRami KassarUniversity of Washington

Key Points

  • To assess the efficacy of hyaluronic acid in improving clinical and radiographic outcomes in periodontal surgery for intrabony defects.
  • Systematic search for randomized controlled trials involving adults with intrabony defects.
  • Primary outcome: probing pocket depth reduction; secondary outcomes: clinical attachment level gain, gingival recession, radiographic defect depth reduction.
  • Meta-analysis using random-effects models with subgroup analyses.
  • Adjunctive HA led to an additional PPD reduction of 0.7-1.2 mm and CAL gain of 0.7-1.1 mm at 12 months.
  • Subgroup analyses showed significant benefits when HA was used alone or with membranes, but not with bone substitutes.
  • HA demonstrated a favorable trend for RDD reduction of about 0.7-1.0 mm, though heterogeneity was observed.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic efficacy of the adjunctive use of hyaluronic acid (HA) in regenerative periodontal surgery for the treatment of intrabony defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adult patients with intrabony defects who underwent regenerative periodontal surgery with adjunctive HA. The primary outcome was probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction; secondary outcomes included clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, gingival recession (REC), and radiographic defect depth (RDD) reduction. Meta-analysis according to the regenerative protocol was performed using random-effects models, with subgroup analyses. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Compared to controls, adjunctive HA resulted in an additional PPD reduction of approximately 0.7-1.2 mm and CAL gain of 0.7-1.1 mm, with more consistent effects at 12 months. Subgroup analyses indicated significant benefits when HA was applied alone or with membranes, whereas no added benefit was observed with bone substitute materials. Radiographic outcomes showed a favorable trend for HA, with an additional RDD reduction of about 0.7-1.0 mm, though heterogeneity was noted. Comparisons between HA and enamel matrix derivative (EMD) revealed comparable or slightly superior results for EMD. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive HA may enhance clinical and radiographic outcomes in intrabony defects when used in regenerative periodontal surgery, although heterogeneity and study quality warrant cautious interpretation of the findings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alrmali et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a3e1809030ad1a9b3091425https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.70063
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper