PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2013Journal of the American Heart Association244 citationsOpen Access

Impact of Global Geographic Region on Time in Therapeutic Range on Warfarin Anticoagulant Therapy: Data From the ROCKET AF Clinical Trial

View Full Paper
DSDaniel E. SingerAHAnne S. HellkampJPJonathan P. Piccini

Structured PICO

P
Population
6,983 patients with atrial fibrillation randomized to warfarin in the ROCKET AF trial, recruited from 45 countries grouped into 7 regions.
I
Intervention
Warfarin (vitamin K antagonist) therapy
O
Outcome
Time in therapeutic range (TTR) defined as international normalized ratio (INR) 2.0 to 3.0, and factors associated with individual patient level TTR (i-TTR)surrogate

Geographic region and prior warfarin experience are dominant, independent determinants of time in therapeutic range for patients with atrial fibrillation on warfarin therapy.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy remains the most common method of stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Time in therapeutic range (TTR) is a widely cited measure of the quality of VKA therapy. We sought to identify factors associated with TTR in a large, international clinical trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: TTR (international normalized ratio INR 2.0 to 3.0) was determined using standard linear interpolation in patients randomized to warfarin in the ROCKET AF trial. Factors associated with TTR at the individual patient level (i-TTR) were determined via multivariable linear regression. Among 6983 patients taking warfarin, recruited from 45 countries grouped into 7 regions, the mean i-TTR was 55.2% (SD 21.3%) and the median i-TTR was 57.9% (interquartile range 43.0% to 70.6%). The mean time with INR 3 was 15.7%. While multiple clinical features were associated with i-TTR, dominant determinants were previous warfarin use (mean i-TTR of 61.1% for warfarin-experienced versus 47.4% in VKA-naïve patients) and geographic region where patients were managed (mean i-TTR varied from 64.1% to 35.9%). These effects persisted in multivariable analysis. Regions with the lowest i-TTRs had INR distributions shifted toward lower INR values and had longer inter-INR test intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of patient clinical features, the regional location of medical care is a dominant determinant of variation in i-TTR in global studies of warfarin. Regional differences in mean i-TTR are heavily influenced by subtherapeutic INR values and are associated with reduced frequency of INR testing. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00403767.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Singer et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7f857a25d25dc9386821cbhttps://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.112.000067
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluation of time in therapeutic range in anticoagulated patients: a single-center, retrospective, observational study2014 · 55 citations
  2. 2Patients’ time in therapeutic range on warfarin among US patients with atrial fibrillation: Results from ORBIT-AF registry2015 · 239 citations
  3. 3Relationship Between Time in Therapeutic Range and Comparative Treatment Effect of Rivaroxaban and Warfarin: Results From the ROCKET AF Trial2014 · 112 citations
  4. 4Estimating Time in Therapeutic Range in Cardiology and Neurology Patients on Warfarin/Acenocoumarol: Assessing its Association with Clinical Outcomes and Influencing Factors for it’s Reliable Use in General Practice2025
  5. 5Benchmark for Time in Therapeutic Range in Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2012 · 84 citations