PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 28, 2021European Journal of Pharmacology15 citationsOpen Access

Dose-dependent opposite effects of nortriptyline on affective-like behavior in adolescent rats: Comparison with adult rats

CBCristian Bis‐HumbertRGRubén García‐CabrerizoMGM. Julia García‐Fuster

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Antidepressant drugs elicit different behavioral and neurochemical responses with age. In fact, the use of antidepressants during adolescence is associated with an increased risk of suicidal thinking, being the best pharmacological treatment during this critical period a matter of constant debate in terms of its risk-benefit outcome. In this regard, the present study compared the effects of nortriptyline (3-10 mg/kg, 7 days) on regulating different aspects of affective-like behavior by screening adolescent and adult Sprague-Dawley rats through several consecutive tests (forced-swim, open field, sucrose preference). Brains were later collected to evaluate hippocampal neurogenesis and mBDNF protein content as potential molecular correlates of the observed behavioral responses. The main results in adolescent rats showed that nortriptyline induced dose-dependent opposite effects: while 3 mg/kg decreased immobility and increased mBDNF (indicative of an antidepressant-like response), 10 mg/kg decreased exploratory time in the open field and mBDNF (suggestive of an anxiogenic-like response). These effects were not associated with changes in neurogenesis regulation. In adult rats, nortriptyline failed to modulate affective-like behavior or the neuroplasticity markers evaluated at the doses tested. In conclusion, clear behavioral and neurochemical differences were observed between adolescent and adult rats in response to nortriptyline treatment. Interestingly, while nortriptyline displayed an antidepressant-like potential at the lowest dose examined in adolescence, a higher dose shifted these results towards a negative outcome, thus reinforcing the need to extreme caution when considering this treatment for our younger population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bis‐Humbert et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a879b6a72575bdad0e9ccb1https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.174465
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper