PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 2026Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society0 citations

Peirce's Cosmological Argumentation: God as Ens necessarium

View Full Paper
JSJon Alan Schmidt

Key Points

  • The research aims to explore Peirce's concept of God as a necessary being and its implications for metaphysics and cosmology.
  • Analysis of two unpublished manuscripts by Charles Peirce
  • Integration of Peirce's key statements into a structured argument
  • Comparison with Leibniz's cosmological argument
  • Establishes a cosmological argument supporting the existence of a necessary being
  • Highlights the significance of Peirce's definition of God as Ens necessarium
  • Raises further questions regarding the relationship between God and the universe

Abstract

Abstract: Charles Peirce begins his best-known text about religious metaphysics by defining the proper name "God" as Ens necessarium . In two previously unpublished manuscripts, he advocates the hypothesis of such a "necessary being" as the only "rational explanation" that is "adequate to account for the sum total of reality," namely, "the three universes" that together encompass "all the phenomena there are." Combining key statements from those passages into a series of distinct steps yields a cosmological argumentation for this conclusion, one resembling that of Gottfried Leibniz. In conjunction with Peirce's other relevant writings, it has implications for the attributes of God, as well as for the relationship between God and the universe, while also raising questions that call for further study.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jon Alan Schmidt (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69746050bb9d90c67120a2a9https://doi.org/10.2979/csp.00048
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper