PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 16, 2001Circulation402 citations

Progression of Aortic Valve Calcification

View Full Paper
KPKarsten PohleRMRalph MäffertDRDieter Ropers

Structured PICO

Does LDL cholesterol level influence the progression of aortic valve calcification and coronary calcification?

P
Population
104 patients (mean age 64.7+/-8 years, 89 male) with an electron beam tomography (EBT) scan positive for aortic valve calcification (AVC)
I
Intervention
LDL cholesterol >3.36 mmol/L (130 mg/dL)
C
Comparator
LDL cholesterol <=3.36 mmol/L (130 mg/dL)
O
Outcome
Progression of aortic valve calcification (AVC) and coronary calcification (CC) quantified by electron beam tomography (EBT)surrogate

Higher LDL cholesterol levels are strongly associated with accelerated progression of aortic valve calcification and coronary calcification, suggesting a potential role for lipid-lowering therapy in mitigating aortic valve sclerosis.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrated an influence of atherosclerotic risk factors on the progression of aortic valve stenosis. The extent of aortic valve calcification (AVC) was also found to be a strong predictor of stenosis progression. We investigated the influence of the LDL cholesterol level (LDL), other standard cardiovascular risk factors, and the extent of coronary calcification (CC) on the progression of AVC quantified by electron beam tomography (EBT). METHODS AND RESULTS: In 104 patients (64.7+/-8 years, 89 male) with an EBT scan positive for AVC, CC and AVC were quantified using a volumetric score. EBT was repeated at a mean interval of 15 months (10 to 36 months), and the progression of AVC and CC was determined. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to LDL: group 1, LDL3.36 mmol/L (130 mg/dL), 47 patients. Mean values for CC were 546+/-932 mm(3) in scan 1 and 665+/-1085 mm(3) in scan 2 for AVC 324+/-796 mm(3) and 404+/-1076 mm(3), respectively. The mean progression of CC was 27+/-37% (group 1, 16+/-22%; group 2, 39+/-46%, P</=0.001) and of AVC was 25+/-38% (group 1, 9+/-22%; group 2, 43+/-44%, P</=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of AVC by EBT permits new insights into the progression of aortic valve sclerosis. We observed a strong influence of LDL cholesterol level on the progression of AVC and CC, suggesting that lipid-lowering therapy may decrease the progression of aortic valve calcification.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pohle et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0512b870c113c9996a63ebhttps://doi.org/10.1161/hc4101.097527
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper