PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 13, 2023Buildings83 citationsOpen Access

Investigation of RC Buildings after 6 February 2023, Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye Earthquakes

HMHalit Cenan MertolGTGökhan TunçTATolga Akış

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Two major earthquakes struck Pazarcık and Elbistan, towns in Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, on 6 February 2023, approximately 9 h apart. The first earthquake, recorded at 04:17 local time, had a Mw = 7.7, with a focal depth of 8.6 km. At 13:24 local time, a second earthquake occurred with Mw = 7.6 at a focal depth of 7 km, approximately 90 km north of the first one. A total of 11 provinces were severely affected by these earthquakes. As of 15 April 2023, they caused close to 51,000 deaths and almost 215,000 completely destroyed/severely damaged buildings. At some locations, the largest horizontal peak ground acceleration (PGA) values of the first and second earthquakes exceeded the code-generated PGAs by almost 3 and 1.75 times, respectively. A technical team visited these areas within 15 h of the first earthquake. The purpose of this article is to present their observations, findings, and the characteristics of the two earthquakes, with comprehensive site survey results supported by photographs. This study concludes that most of the collapsed and severely/moderately damaged buildings in the region were built between 1975 and 2000, when site inspections were rare or non-existent. In addition to the high PGAs recorded in these earthquakes, it was verified that the design and construction of these buildings did not fully comply with the earthquake codes valid at the time. The collapsed buildings and their damage patterns confirm inadequate development length, violation of bending stirrup ends at 135°, deficiencies in construction materials and reinforcement configuration, noncompliance with confinement zones, violation of the strong beam-stronger column analogy, and issues related to building inspection. Based on the extent of the damage, it is strongly recommended that the structural performance inspection of all other buildings located near major fault lines, specifically those constructed between 1975 and 2000, should be completed. Since these earthquakes generated much higher PGAs, which is believed to be one of the main reasons for the extensive damage, a re-evaluation of all other PGAs along major fault lines is also recommended.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mertol et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0828497de338f10b1086c6https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071789
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The earthquake catalogues for Turkey2008 · 187 citations
  2. 2Record Processing in ITACA, the New Italian Strong-Motion Database2010 · 92 citations
  3. 3Engineering seismology: Part I1988 · 454 citations
  4. 4The aftermath of 2011 Van earthquakes: evaluation of strong motion, geotechnical and structural issues2012 · 41 citations
  5. 5Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the May 1, 2003 Bingöl Earthquake in Turkey2004 · 308 citations