PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 1996Archives of Internal Medicine285 citations

Bleeding During Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

View Full Paper

Key Result

Warfarin increased the rate of major bleeding compared to aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation (2.3% vs 1.1% per year; RR 2.1; 95% CI 1.1-3.1; P=0.02).

Key Points

  • To analyze the incidence of bleeding complications in patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy and identify associated risk factors.
  • Randomized 1100 patients to receive either daily aspirin (325 mg) or warfarin, targeting specific prothrombin time ratios.
  • Defined major hemorrhages prospectively to assess bleeding rates.
  • Measured bleeding rates by age and level of anticoagulation intensity.
  • Major bleeding rates were 2.3% per year for warfarin versus 1.1% for aspirin, with a relative risk of 2.1 (P=0.02).
  • Intracranial hemorrhage occurred at 0.9% per year with warfarin vs 0.3% with aspirin, showing a relative risk of 2.4 (P=0.08).
  • Older age and higher intensity of anticoagulation were significant independent risk factors for bleeding, particularly in those aged over 75 years.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=1,100)

Structured PICO

Does warfarin compared to aspirin increase the risk of major hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
1100 patients with atrial fibrillation, mean age 70 years
I
Intervention
Warfarin (target prothrombin time ratio 1.3 to 1.8; approximate INR 2.0 to 4.5)
C
Comparator
Aspirin 325 mg daily (enteric coated)
O
Outcome
Major hemorrhagessafety

In patients with atrial fibrillation, warfarin significantly increases the risk of major hemorrhage compared to aspirin, with advancing age and higher anticoagulation intensity being independent risk factors.

Main Result

Effect estimate: RR 2.1 (95% CI 1.1 to 3.1)

Absolute Event Rate: 2.3% vs 1.1%

p-value: p=.02

Abstract

Background: The Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation II study compared warfarin vs aspirin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Bleeding complications importantly detracted from warfarin's net effectiveness, particularly among older patients. Objectives: To analyze bleeding complications according to assigned therapy. To identify risk factors for bleeding during anticoagulation. Methods: Eleven hundred patients (mean age, 70 years) were randomized to 325 mg of aspirin daily (enteric coated) vs warfarin (target prothrombin time ratio, 1.3 to 1.8; approximate international normalized ratio, 2.0 to 4.5). Major hemorrhages were defined prospectively. Results: The rate of major bleeding while receiving warfarin was 2.3% per year (95% confidence interval CI, 1.7 to 3.2) vs 1.1% per year (95% CI, 0.7 to 1.8) while receiving aspirin (relative risk, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.1;P=.02). Intracranial hemorrhage occurred at 0.9% per year (95% CI, 0.5 to 1.5) with warfarin and 0.3% per year (95% CI, 0.1 to 0.8) with aspirin (relative risk, 2.4;P=.08). Age (P=.006), increasing number of prescribed medications (P=.007), and intensity of anticoagulation (P=.02) were independent risks for bleeding at any site during anticoagulation. The rate of major hemorrhage was 1.7% per year in patients aged 75 years or younger who received anticoagulation vs 4.2% per year in older patients (relative risk, 2.6,P=.009); rates by age for intracranial bleeding were 0.6% per year and 1.8% per year, respectively (P=.05). Conclusion: Advancing age and more intense anticoagulation increase the risk of major hemorrhage in patients given warfarin for stroke prevention. (Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:409-416)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

A 1996 study conducted an RCT in Atrial Fibrillation (n=1,100). Warfarin vs. Aspirin 325 mg daily was evaluated on Major bleeding (RR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.1, p=.02). Warfarin increased the rate of major bleeding compared to aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation (2.3% vs 1.1% per year; RR 2.1; 95% CI 1.1-3.1; P=0.02).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0dd4349a2918c675a504e5https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1996.00440040081009
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper