PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 2, 2004Circulation334 citationsOpen Access

Clinical, Angiographic, and Procedural Predictors of Angiographic Restenosis After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in Complex Patients

View Full Paper
PLPedro A. LemosInterventional / Structural CardiologyAHAngela HoyeBrigham and Women's HospitalDGDick GoedhartNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

Key Points

  • This study aims to identify the predictors of angiographic restenosis following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in complex patients.
  • Cohort of 238 complex patients analyzed based on specific treatment criteria.

Structured PICO

P
Population
238 consecutive complex patients (441 lesions) treated with sirolimus-eluting stent implantation meeting specific criteria (acute myocardial infarction, treatment of in-stent restenosis, 2.25-mm diameter SES, left main coronary stenting, chronic total occlusion, stented segment >36 mm, or bifurcation stenting)
I
Intervention
Sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation
O
Outcome
Binary in-segment restenosis at 6-month angiographic follow-upsurrogate

Angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in complex lesions is infrequent (7.9%) and is primarily predicted by lesion characteristics and diabetes mellitus.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The factors associated with the occurrence of restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation in complex cases are currently unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cohort of consecutive complex patients treated with SES implantation was selected according to the following criteria: (1) treatment of acute myocardial infarction, (2) treatment of in-stent restenosis, (3) 2.25-mm diameter SES, (4) left main coronary stenting, (5) chronic total occlusion, (6) stented segment >36 mm, and (7) bifurcation stenting. The present study population was composed of 238 patients (441 lesions) for whom 6-month angiographic follow-up data were obtained (70% of eligible patients). Significant clinical, angiographic, and procedural predictors of post-SES restenosis were evaluated. Binary in-segment restenosis was diagnosed in 7.9% of lesions (6.3% in-stent, 0.9% at the proximal edge, 0.7% at the distal edge). The following characteristics were identified as independent multivariate predictors: treatment of in-stent restenosis (OR 4.16, 95% CI 1.63 to 11.01; P<0.01), ostial location (OR 4.84, 95% CI 1.81 to 12.07; P<0.01), diabetes (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.14 to 6.31; P=0.02), total stented length (per 10-mm increase; OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.68; P<0.01), reference diameter (per 1.0-mm increase; OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.87; P=0.03), and left anterior descending artery (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.69; P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Angiographic restenosis after SES implantation in complex patients is an infrequent event, occurring mainly in association with lesion-based characteristics and diabetes mellitus.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lemos et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a19b7d843a2499ce8f67511https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000121358.26097.06
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper