PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 30, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Assessment of long-term persistence and phenotypic features of BCMA CAR-T cells in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated with ciltacabtagene autoleucel.

View Full Paper
NBNoffar BarJYJungeun YuJKJennifer Kelly

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the long-term persistence and phenotypic features of BCMA CAR-T cells in patients treated with cilta-cel for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
  • Retrospective analysis of 5 RRMM patients treated with cilta-cel at Yale Cancer Center.
  • Evaluation of circulating CAR-T cells using CB-Scout and spectral flow cytometry (SFC) across multiple time points post-infusion.
  • Comparison of CAR-T phenotypes using a shared immunophenotyping panel and cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).
  • Median peak CAR-T expansion reached 1.3% of PBMCs at early post-infusion time points, concordant with SFC results.
  • By Day 33, CAR-T frequencies declined below 0.01% in 4 out of 5 patients, indicating low cell abundance.
  • Long-term follow-up revealed CAR-T cells detected at rare frequencies (~0.0001%–0.01% of PBMCs) using CB-Scout, allowing phenotypic characterization despite low abundance.

Abstract

e19521 Background: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (Carvykti, cilta-cel) is a BCMA-directed CAR-T associated with deep and durable responses in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). CAR-T cells rapidly expand, peaking 10–14 days post-infusion, after which circulating levels decline and frequently fall below the detection limits (LoD) of spectral flow cytometry (SFC) and next-generation sequencing (NGS). While early expansion correlates with initial response, the relationship between remission durability, and long-term persistence and state of therapeutic cells after response remains poorly understood. This retrospective study evaluated long-term circulating persistence and phenotypic characteristics of CAR-T cells in RRMM patients treated with cilta-cel using CB-Scout, a novel AI-driven nanophotonic imaging ultra-sensitive single-cell assay (Limit of Blank (LoB) < 4.7×10⁻⁸; LoD < 6.1×10⁻⁷). Methods: Five RRMM patients treated with cilta-cel at Yale Cancer Center with available pre-infusion and at least 2 post-infusion (range 2-8) cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples were included in this study. All 5 patients had at least a very good partial response to therapy. Median duration of follow up was 211 days (17-883) with 3 patients having at least 6 months of follow up (211-883 days). CAR-T cells were evaluated using CB-Scout (CellsBin; Vega 1.2 system) and compared to SFC. A shared immunophenotyping panel included CAR detection, memory/stemness markers (CD45RA, CCR7, CD27, CD28, CD95, CD57), activation (CD25, 4-1BB), and exhaustion markers (PD-1, TIGIT, LAG-3, CD39). Results: No CAR-T cells were detected in pre-infusion samples, consistent with the CB-Scout LoB. During early post-infusion time points, median peak CAR-T expansion was 1.3% of PBMCs, concordant with SFC, including ≥80% agreement across key phenotypic metrics. By Day 33, CAR-T frequencies declined below 0.01% of PBMCs in 4/5 patients, falling below SFC reliability limits. In patients with long-term follow-up, CAR-T cells were detected at rare frequencies (~0.0001%–0.01% of PBMCs) using CB-Scout but not by SFC and despite low abundance, phenotypic characterization remained feasible. Detailed CAR-T phenotypic depiction of all 5 patients will be shared during the meeting. Conclusions: Longitudinal cell-therapy tracking with CB-Scout enables assessment of CAR-T phenotypic persistence beyond SFC and NGS. The ability to quantify and phenotypically characterize CAR-T cells at extended time points post infusion may be useful in predicting remission durability and guiding subsequent therapy selection.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a80550307b78509432586https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e19521
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Abstract 3617: Expansion and persistence of anti-BCMA CAR T cells correlates with durability of responses in multiple myeloma patients2024
  2. 2Longitudinal immune monitoring in patients treated with CD19 and BCMA CAR-T cells using standardized 8‑color flow cytometry panel reveals substantial differences among products kinetics and persistence2025 · 1 citations
  3. 3Spatiotemporal and genetic tracking of long-term persisting CAR-T cells following ciltacabtagene autoleucel treatment for multiple myeloma reveals molecular insights into late-onset toxicities2025 · 1 citations
  4. 4Abstract 3616: In vivo expansion patterns of anti-BCMA CAR T-cell in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Comparative immunomonitoring of idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel2024
  5. 5Single-cell transcriptomics reveal mechanisms of efficacy and toxicity in anti-BCMA CAR-T cell therapies for multiple myeloma2025