PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 8, 2015Molecular Cancer Therapeutics90 citations

On the Road to Precision Cancer Medicine: Analysis of Genomic Biomarker Actionability in 439 Patients

View Full Paper
MSMaria SchwaederléGDGregory A. DanielsDPDavid Piccioni

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Despite the increased use of molecular diagnostics, the extent to which patients who have these tests harbor potentially actionable aberrations is unclear. We retrospectively reviewed 439 patients with diverse cancers, for whom next-generation sequencing (mostly 236-gene panel) had been performed. Data pertaining to the molecular alterations identified, as well as associated treatment suggestions (on- or off-label, or experimental), were extracted from molecular diagnostic reports. Most patients (420/439; 96%) had at least one molecular alteration: 1,813 alterations (in 207 distinct genes) were identified the majority being mutations (62%) or amplifications (29%). The three most common gene abnormalities were TP53 (44%), KRAS (16%), and PIK3CA (12%). The median number of alterations per patient was 3 (range, 0-16). Nineteen patients (4%) had no alterations; 48 patients (11%) had only one alteration; and 372 patients had two or more abnormalities (85%). The median number of potentially actionable anomalies per patient was 2 (range, 0-8). Most patients (393/439; 90%) had at least one potentially actionable alteration, and in all these cases the aberration could at least be targeted by an experimental drug in a clinical trial. A total of 307 patients (70%) had an alteration that was actionable with an approved drug, but in only 89 patients (20%) was the drug approved for their disease (on-label). Next-generation sequencing identified theoretically actionable aberrations in 90% of our patients. Many of the drugs are, however, experimental or would require off-label use. Strategies to address drug access for patients harboring potentially actionable mutations are needed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schwaederlé et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1e936fae66660099a40b05https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.mct-14-1061
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Molecular Tumor Board: The University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center Experience2014 · 198 citations
  2. 2Efficacy and Safety of Imatinib Mesylate in Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors2002 · 4,418 citations
  3. 3P53 Mutations in Advanced Cancers: Clinical Characteristics, Outcomes, and Correlation between Progression-Free Survival and Bevacizumab-Containing Therapy2013 · 115 citations
  4. 4K-RAS Mutant Pancreatic Tumors Show Higher Sensitivity to MEK than to PI3K Inhibition In Vivo2012 · 69 citations
  5. 5PIK3CA Mutation H1047R Is Associated with Response to PI3K/AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway Inhibitors in Early-Phase Clinical Trials2012 · 309 citations