PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1994Stroke66 citations

Cost-effectiveness of ticlopidine in preventing stroke in high-risk patients.

View Full Paper
GOGerry OsterDHDaniel M. HuseMLMichael J. Lacey

Key Result

Ticlopidine compared with aspirin for stroke prevention in high-risk patients is estimated to cost between $31,200 and $55,500 per quality-adjusted life-year gained.

Structured PICO

Is ticlopidine cost-effective compared to aspirin for preventing stroke in high-risk patients?

P
Population
A hypothetical cohort of 100 high-risk men and women aged 65 years with recent TIA or minor stroke, modeled for lifetime stroke prevention.
I
Intervention
Ticlopidine 500 mg daily
C
Comparator
Aspirin 1300 mg daily
O
Outcome
Cost-effectiveness (cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained)

Ticlopidine is a cost-effective alternative to aspirin for stroke prevention in high-risk patients, with an estimated cost of $31,200 to $55,500 per QALY gained.

Main Result

Effect estimate: $31,200 to $55,500 per QALY gained

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ticlopidine, an antiplatelet agent, when compared with aspirin has been found to reduce the risk of stroke in high-risk patients, ie, those with recent transient ischemic attack, reversible ischemic neurological deficit, amaurosis fugax, or minor stroke. Its cost-effectiveness in such use, however, is unknown. METHODS: We developed a model of primary stroke prevention in which a hypothetical cohort of 100 high-risk men and women 65 years of age was assumed to receive either ticlopidine (500 mg daily) or aspirin (1300 mg daily). Using published data, we estimated lifetime incidence of stroke, life expectancy (unadjusted and adjusted for changes in quality of life), and lifetime medical care costs associated with each therapy. RESULTS: Patients who receive ticlopidine would experience two fewer initial strokes per hundred than those treated with aspirin. Life expectancy would be extended by approximately one-half month, and lifetime medical care costs (discounted at 5%) would increase by about 2300. The cost-effectiveness of ticlopidine, compared with aspirin, is estimated to range from 31, 200 to 55, 500 per quality-adjusted life-year gained as the utility of life after nonfatal stroke is assumed to vary from 0. 75 to 0. 95. CONCLUSIONS: Ticlopidine therapy to prevent stroke in high-risk patients is cost-effective by current standards of medical practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Oster et al. (1994) studied High risk of stroke (recent TIA, RIND, amaurosis fugax, or minor stroke) (n=100). Ticlopidine vs. Aspirin (1300 mg daily) was evaluated on Cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained ($31,200 to $55,500 per QALY gained). Ticlopidine compared with aspirin for stroke prevention in high-risk patients is estimated to cost between $31,200 and $55,500 per quality-adjusted life-year gained.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a220b8f2e065aea604931adhttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.25.6.1149
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper