PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2017Patient Preference and Adherence76 citationsOpen Access

Assessment of quality of life, satisfaction with anticoagulation therapy, and adherence to treatment in patients receiving long-course vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism

IKIngre KeitaIAIsabelle Aubin-AugerCLChristophe Lalanne

Key Result

Direct oral anticoagulants were associated with better quality of life than vitamin K antagonists in VTE outpatients, though therapeutic adherence was only moderate for both.

Key Points

  • To evaluate the quality of life, satisfaction, and adherence to anticoagulation treatment among patients using VKA and DOAC for venous thromboembolism.
  • Observational descriptive epidemiological study
  • 100 outpatients receiving anticoagulation therapy were assessed
  • Utilized three validated questionnaires for adherence, quality of life, and satisfaction
  • High satisfaction levels reported in both groups of DOAC and VKA users.
  • Moderate adherence to therapy was observed, especially noted in the primary VKA switched to DOAC group.
  • Quality of life was significantly better in the DOAC group, largely due to fewer blood testing requirements.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=100)

Structured PICO

Does DOAC therapy improve adherence, quality of life, and satisfaction compared to VKA in outpatients with VTE?

P
Population
100 outpatients with venous thromboembolism receiving anticoagulation therapy by vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants in France.
E
Exposure
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) (primary or switched from VKA)
C
Comparator
Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) (primary or switched from DOAC)
O
Outcome
Adherence, quality of life, and satisfaction assessed via Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8, EQ-5D, and Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnairepatient reported

DOACs offer better quality of life than VKAs for VTE outpatients, primarily due to the absence of routine blood testing, though adherence remains a challenge requiring physician-patient engagement.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown non-inferiority and ease of use compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). No study so far has been directed toward real-life experience of outpatients receiving anticoagulants for VTE in France. METHODS: This is an observational descriptive real-life epidemiological study, using three validated questionnaires (Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8, EQ-5D, and part 2 of the Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire), to assess adherence, quality of life, and satisfaction in 100 VTE outpatients receiving anticoagulation therapy by VKA (primary or switched from DOAC to VKA) or by DOAC (primary or switched from VKA to DOAC). RESULTS: Patients were very much satisfied with their treatment in both DOAC and VKA groups. Despite advantages of DOACs, therapeutic adherence was only moderate. The best adherence scores were observed in the primary VKA switched to DOAC for at least 3 months (S-DOAC) subgroup. Quality of life was better in the DOAC group mainly because of the absence of the requirement for blood testing. Most of the complaints concerned the pain/discomfort dimension in the VKA group and anxiety/depression dimension in the DOAC group. CONCLUSION: Patients were satisfied with their anticoagulant treatment, especially when they were involved in choosing the anticoagulant, and the treatment suited them. Quality of life of patients in the DOAC group was better than in the VKA group, but adherence remains to be improved. This study highlights the importance of the physician-patient relationship, pretreatment initiation, and follow-up of any anticoagulation therapy throughout.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Keita et al. (2017) conducted an observational in venous thromboembolism (n=100). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) was evaluated on Adherence, quality of life, and satisfaction. Direct oral anticoagulants were associated with better quality of life than vitamin K antagonists in VTE outpatients, though therapeutic adherence was only moderate for both.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2248ef965ac14388496c38https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s131157
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper