PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 26, 2026Journal of Structural Geology0 citationsOpen Access

From a sample to the mantle: Analyzing CPO, quantifying uncertainty, and modeling seismic anisotropy

View Full Paper
KBKatherine BillingsPSPhilip Skemer

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how sample size affects the measurement of crystallographic preferred orientation (CPO) and its relation to seismic anisotropy.
  • Generated large synthetic datasets (10^6 unique orientations) across various texture strengths and crystal symmetries.
  • Measured texture strength using the M-index for subsamples ranging from 10 to 5,000.
  • Calculated seismic anisotropy of P-waves and S-waves for datasets simulating olivine.
  • M-index and seismic anisotropy are overestimated at small population sizes but align with true values as population increases.
  • Uncertainty in measurements decreases with larger population sizes below 2%.
  • Thresholds established for minimum and optimal sample sizes needed for meaningful results vary significantly depending on crystal system and texture strength.

Abstract

Accurate measurement of crystallographic preferred orientation (CPO) is necessary to characterize anisotropic material properties. In geologic and engineered materials, crystal orientation datasets can be limited due to sample volumes or other practical constraints. To examine the effect of sample size on texture measurements, we generated large synthetic datasets (10 6 unique orientations) for a range of texture strengths and crystal symmetries. For each dataset, we measured texture strength (using the M-index) for 1,000 subsamples across a range of population sizes (n = 10 – 5,000). For datasets simulating olivine, the most abundant mineral in the upper mantle, we also calculated the seismic anisotropy of P-waves and S-waves and measured the position of maximum density for the seismically fast 100 axes for unimodal and girdled distributions. The M-index and the magnitude of seismic anisotropy are systematically overestimated at small population sizes but converge to “true” values when populations are sufficient. The uncertainty in a given measurement is reduced as population size increases. To help guide data acquisition by users of the electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) technique, we establish two thresholds: a minimum sample size required for a meaningful result, and a greater sample size required to reduce uncertainty below 2%. In general, the number of data required to achieve these thresholds depends on crystal system, texture strength, and measurement quantity, and may vary by up to two orders of magnitude. To illustrate a use case for these data, we calculate the uncertainties associated with experimental and natural results that have been used to constrain numerical models of olivine CPO evolution.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Billings et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a3e1843030ad1a9b3091666https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2026.105740
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper