PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 28, 2015The American Journal of Gastroenterology145 citations

Detection of Small Bowel Mucosal Healing and Deep Remission in Patients With Known Small Bowel Crohn’s Disease Using Biomarkers, Capsule Endoscopy, and Imaging

View Full Paper
UKUri KopylovDYDoron YablecovitchALAdi Lahat

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Mucosal healing (MH) and deep remission (DR) are associated with improved outcomes in Crohn's disease (CD). However, most of the current data pertain to colonic MH and DR, whereas the evidence regarding the prevalence and impact of small bowel (SB) MH is scarce. The aim of this study was to to evaluate the prevalence of SBMH and DR in quiescent SBCD. METHODS: Patients with known SBCD in clinical remission (CDAI790. Clinico-biomarker remission was defined as a combination of clinical remission and normal biomarkers. DR was defined as a combination of clinico-biomarker remission and MH. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients with proven SB patency were enrolled; 52 (92.9%) patients were in clinical remission and 21 (40.4%) in clinico-biomarker remission. SBMH was demonstrated in 8/52 (15.4%) of patients in clinical remission. Moderate-to-severe SB inflammation was demonstrated in 11/52 (21.1%) of patients in clinical remission and in 1/21 (4.7%) of patients in clinical and biomarker remission. Only 7/52 (13.5%) patients were in DR. CONCLUSIONS: SB inflammation is detected in the majority of CD patients in clinical and biomarker remission. SBMH and DR were rare and were independent of treatment modality. Our findings represent the true inflammatory burden in quiescent patients with SBCD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kopylov et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a61b01344847eed21c91b20https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2015.221
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper