PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 1997AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology40 citations

Myocardial dysfunction is associated with activation of Na+/H+exchange immediately during reperfusion

View Full Paper
TMThane G. MaddafordGPGrant N. Pierce

Structured PICO

P
Population
Coronary-perfused right ventricular wall (RVW) and whole hearts subjected to 60 min of global ischemia
I
Intervention
Dimethyl amiloride (DMA) exposure at various time points (e.g., 1 min immediately at reperfusion, near end of ischemia, preischemic)
C
Comparator
Different timing of DMA administration (delayed, washed out before ischemia)
O
Outcome
Cardioprotection (prevention of contractile dysfunction)surrogate

Na+/H+ exchange is active and contributes to contractile dysfunction during the first seconds of reperfusion, and immediate inhibition at reperfusion provides cardioprotection in isolated tissue.

Abstract

Amiloride analogs block Na+/H+ exchange and thereby protect the heart from myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. It is unclear whether drugs must be present before ischemia to be cardioprotective. After 60 min of global ischemia in the coronary-perfused right ventricular wall (RVW), as little as 1 min of exposure to dimethyl amiloride (DMA) immediately at the time of reperfusion protected the RVW. Delaying the drug attenuated the cardioprotection. If DMA was introduced in an ischemic solution near the end of ischemia, the cardioprotective effects were augmented. If the drug was washed out of the RVW vascular space before ischemia, cardioprotection was not observed. In contrast, in whole hearts, preischemic perfusion of the drug was necessary for cardioprotection and the cardioprotection remained even if the drug was washed out before ischemia. We conclude that Na+/H+ exchange is active and contributes to contractile dysfunction during the first seconds of reperfusion. This is difficult to detect in the perfused whole heart, and the washout data suggest that this may be due to a limitation in drug delivery across the vascular wall. The data also suggest that the exchanger is not as active during ischemia itself as it is during reperfusion.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Maddaford et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6f590078a11c550e090a83https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1997.273.5.h2232
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effect of amiloride and selected analogues on postischemic recovery of cardiac contractile function1993 · 66 citations
  2. 2Protective effects of 5-(N,N-dimethyl)amiloride on ischemia-reperfusion injury in hearts1990 · 86 citations
  3. 3Dimethyl amiloride, a Na+–H+ exchange inhibitor, and its cardioprotective effects in hemorrhagic shock in in vivo resuscitated rats2009 · 11 citations
  4. 4Comparative Effects of Na+/H+ Exchange Inhibitors Against Cardiac Injury Produced by Ischemia/Reperfusion, Hypoxia/Reoxygenation, and the Calcium Paradox1993 · 58 citations
  5. 5Amiloride enhances postischemic ventricular recovery: possible role of Na+-H+ exchange1988 · 186 citations