PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1997American Journal of Critical Care33 citations

The impact of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator on quality of life

View Full Paper
RGR. GallagherSMSharon McKinleyBMBelle Mangan

Key Points

  • To consolidate current research on how implantable cardioverter defibrillators affect the quality of life of recipients and their families and identify critical directions for future study.
  • Narrative review synthesizing published literature on the psychosocial, cognitive, and family-level impacts of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.

Structured PICO

Does the implantable cardioverter defibrillator impact quality of life and psychological well-being in patients with ventricular arrhythmias?

P
Population
Patients with ventricular arrhythmias who are recipients of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, and their families
I
Intervention
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator
O
Outcome
Quality of life, psychological reactions, and coping mechanismspatient reported

While implantable cardioverter defibrillators provide reassurance, they also cause significant psychological distress such as fear and anxiety due to unpredictable shocks, highlighting the need for targeted nursing interventions and standardized quality-of-life assessments.

Limitations

  • Lack of consistent, standardized quality-of-life measures across studies

Abstract

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator may prolong survival and prevent sudden cardiac arrest in patients with ventricular arrhythmias. Whereas previous research focused on mortality, attention is now turning to the impact of the device on the recipient. We reviewed the literature on the effects of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator on recipients and their families; our aim was to consolidate our current understanding and guide further research in this area. We found a number of effects on which researchers agree. Primarily, recipients are happy to have the device and generally feel more confident. However, recipients experience many psychological reactions such as fear and anxiety that can be related to the unpredictable nature of the shocks. Recipients also are affected by intellectual changes. Both recipients and their families experience similar effects and use a range of coping mechanisms; the most effective is optimism. Only one nursing intervention has been investigated that directly addresses these effects. Areas that need more research are the effects of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator during childhood, adolescence, and pregnancy; the impact of vigilance on recipients and their families; costs; and nursing interventions. More consistent, standardized quality-of-life measures are needed so that comparisons can be made between samples.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gallagher et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a70e0ad5d37378ac1de0ac7https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc1997.6.1.16
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper