PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 14, 2005Circulation352 citations

Prognostic Value of Troponin T and I Among Asymptomatic Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease

View Full Paper
NKNadia KhanBHBrenda R. HemmelgarnMTMarcello Tonelli

Key Points

  • To evaluate the prognostic value of elevated troponin T and I in predicting mortality among asymptomatic end-stage renal disease patients.
  • Conducted a systematic review of 28 studies involving 3931 patients published until December 2004.

Structured PICO

Does elevated troponin T or I predict long-term mortality in asymptomatic patients with end-stage renal disease?

P
Population
3,931 asymptomatic patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) not suspected of having acute coronary syndrome, pooled from 28 prospective observational studies. Median dialysis duration 4 years.
I
Intervention
Elevated troponin T (>0.1 ng/mL) or troponin I
C
Comparator
Non-elevated troponin levels
O
Outcome
Long-term all-cause mortalityhard clinical

Elevated troponin T (>0.1 ng/mL) is a strong prognostic marker for all-cause and cardiac mortality in asymptomatic patients with end-stage renal disease.

Limitations

  • Significant heterogeneity in the magnitude of effect sizes
  • Evidence of publication bias
  • Lack of standardization of troponin I assays rendering synthesis difficult

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic usefulness of troponin enzymes in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients is controversial. To resolve this uncertainty of troponin as a prognostic tool, we conducted a systematic review to quantify the association between elevated troponin I or T and long-term total mortality among ESRD patients not suspected of having acute coronary syndrome. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted an unrestricted search from the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and DARE bibliographic databases to December 2004 using the terms troponin.mp. or exp troponin and exp kidney, exp renal, exp kidney disease exp renal replacement therapy. We also manually searched review articles and bibliographies to supplement the search. Studies were included if they were prospective observational studies, used cardiac-specific troponin assays, and evaluated long-term risk of death or cardiac events for asymptomatic ESRD patients. Two authors independently abstracted data on study and patient characteristics. Studies findings were stratified according to troponin T or I levels. We used a random-effects model to pool study results and tested for heterogeneity using chi2 testing and used funnel-plot inspection to evaluate the presence of publication bias. Data from 28 studies (3931 patients) published between 1999 and December 2004 were included in this review. Patients received dialysis for a median duration of 4 years, with a mean follow-up of 23 months. From the pooled analysis, elevated troponin T (>0.1 ng/mL) was significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality (relative risk, 2.64; 95% CI, 2.17 to 3.20). Although the prognostic effect sizes were all consistent with a positive relationship between troponin T and mortality, there was significant heterogeneity in the magnitude of these effect sizes (P=0.015). The funnel plot showed evidence of publication bias. Elevated troponin T was also strongly associated with increased cardiac death. Studies evaluating troponin I included a wide variety of assays and differing cut points, rendering synthesis of the study findings difficult. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated troponin T (>0.1 ng/mL) identifies a subgroup of ESRD patients who have poor survival and a high risk of cardiac death despite being asymptomatic. These findings suggest that troponin T is a promising risk stratification tool and may help frame therapeutic decisions. The clinical interpretation of elevated troponin I levels, however, remain unclear, largely because of the lack of standardization of assays.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khan et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a71546178a11c550e0b6379https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.560128
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper