July 21, 2025

A Narrative Review on the Current Landscape of Invasive Neuromodulation for Poststroke Motor Recovery: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Puntos clave

Invasive neuromodulation shows promise for enhancing poststroke recovery, but remains non-standard of care.
Clinical trials reveal varying outcomes due to factors like stroke location and rehabilitation intensity.
Technological advancements in electrode design may improve neuromodulation effectiveness.
Understanding the mechanisms of invasive techniques is key to optimizing patient recovery outcomes.

Resumen

Stroke is a leading cause of disability. Despite rehabilitation efforts, most survivors of stroke do not fully recover. Invasive neuromodulation has shown promise but has not yet become standard of care in poststroke rehabilitation. Given the inherent drawbacks of invasive modalities, a critical evaluation is warranted. This review examines invasive neuromodulation strategies for poststroke recovery, focusing on their mechanisms of action, clinical evidence, and technical challenges. A structured search was conducted using PubMed for studies from 2000 to 2025, with the terms ("Stroke"MeSH OR "Stroke Rehabilitation"MeSH) and ("Neurostimulation" OR "Invasive Electrical Stimulation" OR "Deep Brain Stimulation" OR "Epidural Stimulation" OR "Spinal Cord Stimulation" OR "Cortical Stimulation" OR "Cerebellar Stimulation"). Only human studies were included. Moreover, clinical trials from ClinicalTrials.gov and the European Union Clinical Trials Register were cross-referenced, and preclinical studies underpinning selected clinical trials were integrated. Vagal nerve stimulation has received Food and Drug Administration approval, whereas motor cortex stimulation, cerebellar stimulation, and spinal cord stimulation remain investigational. These methods aim to recruit residual motor networks and promote plasticity. However, narrow cohorts, variability in stroke location and timing, differences in rehabilitation intensity, and inconsistencies in outcome measures present significant challenges to achieving consistent and broadly applicable therapeutic outcomes across trials. Given the risks associated with invasive techniques, a deeper understanding of their mechanisms is essential to maximizing their therapeutic potential. Nevertheless, advances in electrode technology, adaptive stimulation, and multimodal approaches hold promise for optimizing the effectiveness of invasive neuromodulation and improving patient outcomes.

Me gusta

Guardar

Cite This Study

Kılıç et al. (Sat,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a060ee6551bb0af8cd45e https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2025.06.004

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

Me gusta

Guardar