Tight oil reservoirs are characterized by low porosity, low permeability, and low saturation, making it difficult to achieve economic development through conventional water injection. This study experimentally evaluated different injection media and oil displacement methods and used nuclear magnetic resonance methods to explain the micro mechanisms of oil displacement during different oil displacement processes. The experiments showed that supercritical CO2 flooding and supercritical CO2 and active water alternating flooding were much more useful for low-permeability reservoirs compared with conventional water flooding. This technology can increase the recovery rate by more than 12.0%, which is 33.24% higher than the rate achieved with conventional water injection. In addition, it can effectively improve the rapid increase in water content caused by the rapid advance in the water front during the water injection process. The NMR results indicated good consistency for the recovery efficiency of pores under different oil displacement conditions. When the aperture varied between 0.1 µm and 1 µm (type III), the utilization rate was highest, followed by type IV (1–10 µm), type II (0.01–0.1 µm), and type I (0.001–0.01 µm). By comparison, conventional water and CO2 alternating flooding was more effective for type III pores, increasing oil recovery by 12.58%, while active water + CO2 alternating flooding can further drive oil, increasing oil recovery by 33.24% and greatly displacing oil in micro-pores and macro-pores.
Wang et al. (Tue,) studied this question.