The study focuses on the constitutional provisions regulating the process of resignation of the government, as well as the procedure for appointing the next Council of Ministers. The author referred in detail to the cases in which the Council of Ministers ends its office. It was emphasised that although the Constitution does not limit the competences of the resigning Council of Ministers, according to the representatives of the doctrine, both the government and the Prime Minister should then limit themselves to the management of current state affairs. In addition, the study indicates historical instances of the use of the mechanism of the resignation of the Prime Minister, and refers to the scope of parliamentary oversight over the resigning Council of Ministers.
Filip Misiak (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: