Background/Objectives: Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is a cornerstone in evaluating stable coronary artery disease (CAD), but conventional energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) has limitations, including calcium blooming and limited spatial resolution. Photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) may overcome these drawbacks through enhanced spatial resolution and improved tissue characterization. Methods: In this retrospective, propensity score–matched study, we compared CCTA findings from 820 patients (410 per group) who underwent either EID-CT or PCD-CT for suspected stable CAD. Primary outcomes included stenosis severity, high-risk plaque features, and downstream invasive coronary angiography (ICA) referral and yield. Results: The matched cohorts were balanced in demographics and cardiovascular risk factors (mean age 67 years, 63% male). PCD-CT showed a favorable shift in stenosis severity distribution (p = 0.03). High-risk plaques were detected less frequently with PCD-CT (22.7% vs. 30.5%, p = 0.01). Median coronary calcium scores did not differ (p = 0.60). Among patients referred for ICA, those initially evaluated with PCD-CT were more likely to undergo revascularization (62.5% vs. 44.1%), and fewer underwent potentially unnecessary ICA without revascularization (3.7% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.001). The specificity in diagnosing significant stenosis requiring revascularization was 0.74 with EID-CT and 0.81 with PCD-CT (p = 0.04). Conclusions: PCD-CT improved diagnostic specificity for CAD, reducing unnecessary ICA referrals while maintaining detection of clinically significant disease. This advanced CT technology holds promise for more accurate, efficient, and patient-centered CAD evaluation.
Nakashima et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: