Background: Vertical jump ability is a critical determinant of basketball performance, contributing directly to rebounding, shot blocking, and scoring effectiveness. Plyometric and resistance training are two widely applied modalities to enhance lower-limb power, yet their relative effectiveness in collegiate-level basketball remains debated. Objective: To compare the effects of plyometric training and resistance training on vertical jump performance in collegiate basketball players. Methods: In this randomized controlled study, 56 male collegiate basketball players were allocated into a plyometric training group (n = 28) or a resistance training group (n = 28). Both interventions were conducted over eight weeks with three supervised sessions per week. Vertical jump height was measured at baseline and post-intervention using a standardized Vertec device. Data were analyzed with paired and independent t-tests, effect sizes, and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Both groups demonstrated significant within-group improvements. Plyometric training increased vertical jump height by 7.4 cm (95% CI: 5.8–9.0, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.88), while resistance training improved performance by 4.9 cm (95% CI: 3.2–6.6, p = 0.004, Cohen’s d = 1.19). Between-group analysis showed a mean difference of 2.9 cm favoring plyometric training (95% CI: 0.5–5.3, p = 0.02, Cohen’s d = 0.68). Conclusion: Plyometric training produced superior improvements in vertical jump compared with resistance training, though both were effective. A balanced, periodized program integrating both modalities may optimize performance and injury prevention in collegiate basketball players.
Sarwar et al. (Mon,) studied this question.