Objective: This descriptive, cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the learning style and the learningoutcome amongst students of different levels of study. Materials and Methods: A known system; Visual, Aural, Read/write, and Kinesthetic (VARK) was used toanalyze the learning outcome of the 235 students, interns and faculty members from Hamdard UniversityDental Hospital. This study was carried out on all levels of the students and faculty members, (a total of 235members including Professors, Lecturers, Interns and students from all levels). A valid and knownquestionnaire VARK was used to analyze the learning outcome amongst the subjects, and the results werethen analyzed statistically. Results: During the initial years of the BDS, students learn more by listening, aided by reading and writing intheir second year, while Kinesthetic in their clinical year. Postgraduate students and lecturers depend moreupon their kinesthetics. Keeping in mind the interest of the senior faculty more in research, their learningstyles are more on reading and writing aided by kinesthetic and aural supports. Conclusion: The learning styles vary from age to age amongst the same person, and students, as well asteachers, must understand their art of learning and deliver better results.
Basit et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: