Objective: The objective of this study is to understand the work experiences of women in professions that are culturally classified as masculine, through the lens of Work Psychodynamics. Theoretical Framework: The constructs of pleasure, suffering, and recognition from Work Psychodynamics are presented based on the contributions of Dejours (1998; 2004; 2022; 2014). Additionally, theoretical insights from Eagly and Wood (2016), Anker (1998), Watts (2009), and Teixeira et al. (2021) are included to address social role theory and occupational gender segregation. Method: A qualitative approach was adopted, focusing on understanding the meanings attributed by participants to their experiences in male-dominated professions. A multiple case study was conducted using convenience sampling, through semi-structured interviews. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using the Core Meaning Analysis (Mendes, 2007), based on Bardin’s (1977) content analysis. Results and Discussion: The findings reveal that although participants did not report explicit forms of pathogenic suffering, their professional trajectories are marked by subtle yet persistent challenges related to the sexual division of labor. The importance of cooperation and workplace relationships is emphasized, as well as the judgment and recognition from peers, managers, and clients, which are essential for transforming suffering into pleasure, alongside identification with the profession. Research Implications: This study contributes to understanding how women in traditionally male professions face work-related challenges and supports the development of practices aimed at fostering more inclusive work environments with greater opportunities for retention and career advancement. Originality/Value: This study opens a broad field for further exploration, as the literature shows a research gap in the intersection of gender diversity management, occupational gender segregation, and Work Psychodynamics.
Sousa et al. (Tue,) studied this question.