Background: Breast reconstruction post-mastectomy has increasingly emphasized the importance of sensory restoration. This study aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of anterior versus lateral cutaneous intercostal nerve branches in neurotization during abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction. Methods: Through a systematic literature search and meta-analysis, we reviewed studies published between January 2003 and August 2023. Our methods involved categorizing studies based on the nerve branch used, extracting relevant data, and conducting a quality assessment. To determine the difference in the magnitude of sensory recovery, a meta-analysis was conducted to pool the effect sizes (mean differences) from individual studies. Given the potential for heterogeneity across studies, a random-effects model was employed using the DerSimonian and Laird method. Subgroup analysis was then performed to separately evaluate the effect sizes for the anterior and lateral groups. Results: We identified five studies for the anterior group and five studies for the lateral group. The anterior group included a total of 225 non-neurotized and 240 neurotized breasts, while the lateral group consisted of 62 non-neurotized and 51 neurotized breasts. The anterior group exhibited superior sensory recovery compared to the lateral group (p = 0.08 for the common effect model). The result was borderline significant, suggesting a trend towards a difference between the two groups. In terms of patient-reported outcomes, the anterior group provided data, while the lateral group lacked such data, underscoring a potential research gap. Conclusions: Results indicated a trend favoring the anterior cutaneous branch, with studies showing improved sensory outcomes and patient satisfaction. However, the choice between the two should be individualized, considering the patient’s unique needs and the surgeon’s expertise.
Jeong et al. (Sun,) studied this question.