This paper examines the crucial, yet often debated, roles of major International Organisations (IOs), particularly the United Nations (UN), the WTO, and the IMF, within the framework of modern global governance. Globalisation creates collective action problems that are highly complex, involving pandemics, climate change, and financial instability, that demand effective international cooperation. However, IOs face pressure from sovereignty concerns, geopolitical divisions, and internal inefficiencies. This study employs a qualitative research approach, reviewing peer-reviewed literature, IO institutional reports, and public policy documents to develop a conceptual framework for IOs and global governance. A detailed case study of the World Health Organisations (WHO) response to COVID-19 carefully examines the competing demands and capacities of global health governance and multilateral collaboration. Overall, the analysis demonstrates that IOs are undeniably vital for global collective decision-making. Yet, it also highlights how IOs struggle with funding models and enforcement by member states. The paper further assesses regional organisations to determine whether they complement or compete with IOs. In other words, the findings offer insights into whether regional organisations exacerbate problems in global governance. Despite their importance in addressing global challenges, IOS often faces dysfunction, political divisions among members, and inequalities. The study concludes that existing institutions must be reformed or new models of cooperative engagement developed to ensure that IOs remain relevant in a fragmented yet interconnected world.
Emmanuel Okoh Agyemang (Mon,) studied this question.