Relevance. Under conditions of large-scale internal displacement in Ukraine (3.6 million people as of October 2024), the issue of social cohesion in host communities has become increasingly important. According to the International Organization for Migration, 76% of internally displaced persons plan to stay in their new region for more than a year, which requires effective social integration mechanisms. Methodology. A theoretical analysis of scientific research and statistical data on the integration of internally displaced persons in Ukraine was conducted. Data from the International Organization for Migration, Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, and the reSCORE project were analyzed. Social cohesion is examined through three main dimensions: cultural-territorial, state-administrative, and social capital. These dimensions encompass various aspects of social interaction, including social connections, sense of belonging, and society's ability to ensure the well-being of its members. Results. The challenges faced by internally displaced persons have been systematized: psychological trauma (67%), employment difficulties (45%), limited access to social services (34%), problems with access to medical services (28%). Existing mechanisms for developing social cohesion during wartime have been generalized: institutional (establishment of advisory bodies), socio-economic (employment programs), social integration (creation of hubs), and communication (development of information platforms). Conclusions. It has been established that social cohesion is not merely a theoretical construct but a practical mechanism of social work that requires a comprehensive approach to address socio-economic, socio-psychological, and cultural-communicative challenges. Through the development of inclusive practices and the formation of a common space for interaction in host communities, social cohesion serves as the foundation for social stability, promoting mutual trust and strengthening social bonds between local residents and internally displaced persons.
Chuiko et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: