Internet addiction has become a significant concern due to its detrimental effects on individual well-being, leading to emotional, psychological, and social challenges. Scholars have long explored various strategies to mitigate the risk of internet addiction. Recently, scholars have argued that religion is a protective factor against internet addiction. However, empirical research has reported a mix of negative and nonsignificant main effects. In this study, we used an instrumental variable quantile analysis to re-estimate the impact of religion (religious belief and religiosity) on internet addiction (generalized internet addiction and short video addiction) based on data from a nationally representative survey and (N = 2337; Mage = 42.03, SD = 14.15, range = 18 to 86) an online survey (N = 441, Mage = 28.98, SD = 7.59, range = 18 to 59). The results indicated that religious belief could suppress generalized internet addiction and short video addiction when endogeneity was not considered. However, when endogeneity was taken into account, the impacts of religious belief on generalized internet addiction and short video addiction were not significant. In addition, the impact of religiosity on short video addiction changed from significant to nonsignificant when endogeneity was considered. Our findings revealed that the protective effect of religion on internet addiction was very limited. Our study also provides a possible explanation for the existing mixed conclusions about religion and internet addiction.
Jiang et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: