PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 2, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Broad Strokes with a Fine Brush. Pliny Pan. 25 and its Sallustian Intertexts

View Full Paper
CKChristopher B. Krebs

Key Points

  • Pliny’s rejection of selective narration aligns with Sallust’s approach, emphasizing a dialogue between the two authors.
  • The analysis provides evidence for Pliny's unique method of engagement with historical themes and self-representation.
  • By referencing Sallust’s silence on key subjects, Pliny crafts a critical perspective on historiographical practices.
  • This exploration of Pliny’s work illustrates broader themes of imitation and artistic expression in literature.

Abstract

Justifying the lengthy details of his thanksgiving to the emperor (Pan. 25), Pliny alludes to two programmatic statements by Sallust. He first quotes the historian’s explicit choice of narrating history in selection (carptim, Cat. 4.2) in order to reject such a selective approach in his own case; and he justifies his rejection by adapting Sallust’s silence on mighty Carthage (Iug. 19.2). Pliny thus—indirectly and wittily (both in character)—contradicts Sallust with Sallust. In sum, the passage offers further evidence of Pliny’s dialogue with historiography, his ‘combinatorial imitation’ and, more generally, art en miniature, as well as his self-fashioning.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Christopher B. Krebs (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68de796d5b556a9128e1ad11https://doi.org/10.29173/histos716
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper