PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 2, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Waiting Time from Referral to Intake and Its Clinical Implications: Routine Outcome Monitoring Data from a Large Dutch Outpatient Clinic

View Full Paper
SMS MenéndezKSKim M. K. S. StehouwerMAMatthew Abikenari

Key Points

  • Mean psychological distress scores did not clinically change, showing stability among most patients.
  • With 92% unchanged, only 6% deteriorated and 1% improved, suggesting minor effects of waiting time on mental health.
  • Routine outcome monitoring data from 962 individuals was utilized to assess symptom changes before intake.
  • Further research is needed to refine strategies to identify individuals at risk of mental health deterioration.

Abstract

Background: Long waiting times remain a key barrier to accessing outpatient mental health care in the Netherlands and worldwide. Little is known about patterns of symptom change during waiting times and whether certain individuals are at greater risk of deterioration. This brief report used routine outcome monitoring data from Dutch outpatient clinics to examine changes in psychological distress during waiting and to test whether age, sex, socioeconomic status, and length of waiting predicted improvement or worsening. Methods: Routine outcome monitoring data were analyzed from 962 individuals referred by their general practitioner to a large Dutch outpatient mental health provider. Psychological distress was assessed with the Symptom-Questionnaire-48 (SQ-48), which participants completed at both referral and intake. We computed reliable Change Indices (RCI) to classify individuals as improved, deteriorated, or unchanged. Logistic and multinomial logistic regression were used to examine the effects of waiting time, socioeconomic status, age, and sex on change status during waiting times. Results: Mean SQ-48 scores decreased significantly between referral and intake, but changes were not clinically meaningful. Most patients (92.02%) showed no reliable change; 6.03% deteriorated, and 1.35% improved. Waiting time, sex, age, and socioeconomic status did not predict symptom change during waiting time. Limitations include the relatively short average waiting time (M = 18.90 days), limited variability in socioeconomic status, and potential systematic dropout. Conclusions: Most individuals remained stable, with only small proportions showing reliable improvement or deterioration during short waiting times. These findings highlight the need for precision-based approaches to identify those at risk of worsening.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Menéndez et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68de79715b556a9128e1b17ehttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ej4z7_v2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Not just spontaneous remission: Time-dependent and independent effects in pre-intervention symptom reduction2026
  2. 2The wait time study: (Cost-) Effectiveness of a personalized e-health intervention for patients with psychiatric disorders on waiting lists for treatment– a randomized controlled trial2025
  3. 3Impact of Psychiatric Follow-Up Frequency on Outcomes and Waiting Times2024 · 5 citations
  4. 4How Is Waitlist Duration Associated With Clinical Presentation and Treatment Engagement in Public Eating Disorder Services? A Cohort Study2026
  5. 5The effects of waiting time for outpatient psychotherapeutic interventions on patient-reported outcomes in adolescents and adults with eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis2026