PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 5, 2025Neuro-Oncology0 citationsOpen Access

P01.15.a Single Nucleus Transcriptomics of Spinal Ependymoma Types and Subtypes Recognizes Intratumoral Heterogeneity

View Full Paper
KHKalesha HackSJSaskia-Larissa Jauch-SpeerCKCatena Kresbach

Key Points

  • Ependymoma subtypes show a broad tumor microenvironment, highlighting individual heterogeneity across samples.
  • Myxopapillary ependymomas displayed significantly higher astrocytic cell states compared to spinal ependymomas.
  • Single nucleus transcriptomic sequencing was applied to analyze 25 spinal ependymomal tumors, providing insights into tumor cell composition.
  • MPE-A and SP-EPN share similar histological features, indicating limited clonal evolution over time.

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND The two most prevalent types of spinal ependymal tumors are myxopapillary ependymomas (MPE) and spinal ependymomas (SP-EPN). Based on molecular data from bulk tumor samples, we previously identified clinically relevant subtypes with poor (MPE-A; SP-EPN-A) and favorable progression-free survival (MPE-B; SP-EPN-B). However, detailed cellular compositions, molecular heterogeneity, and features of tumor progression are largely unknown. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed single nucleus transcriptomic sequencing of 25 formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded spinal ependymomal tumors including all MPE and SP-EPN subtypes as well as six paired primary and relapsed MPE-A. RESULTS Ependymoma subtypes presented with a broad, but comparable tumor microenvironment. Furthermore, neoplastic cells demonstrated inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity regarding cancer cell state composition. Overall, MPE tumors exhibited a significantly higher abundance of the astrocytic state, whereas a ciliated state was more prevalent in SP-EPN. Also, transcriptome-inferred copy number profiles revealed tumor cell clusters with distinct chromosomal alterations across tumors, suggesting subclonal neoplastic growth. Compared to normal human spinal cord cell populations, MPE tumor cells displayed similarities to astrocytes and ependymal cells, whereas SP-EPN exclusively matched ependymal cells. MPE-A demonstrated a distinct profile, being similar to the roof and floor plate of the developing spinal cord as well as more undifferentiated cell populations. Paired primary and relapsed MPE-A revealed mostly similar histology, epigenetics, copy number profiles and cellular composition of neoplastic cells, arguing against a strong clonal selection process over time. CONCLUSION Single nucleus transcriptomic sequencing provides valuable insights into the molecular composition of spinal ependymoma types and subtypes and may pave the way for a better understanding of tumor evolution and identification of therapeutic targets.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hack et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e24e59d6d66a53c2472ed9https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf193.095
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper