PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 30, 2024Pediatric Pulmonology8 citationsOpen Access

Inhaled corticosteroid delivery is markedly affected by breathing pattern and valved holding chamber model

View Full Paper
LOLaura OjanperäLLLauri LehtimäkiHHHeini Huhtala

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Background There is a scarcity of high‐quality research on the efficient delivery of inhaled corticosteroids using valved holding chambers (VHCs) in children. Methods The delivered dose (DD) of fluticasone from a metered dose inhaler (pMDI) was tested using four VHCs: AeroChamber plus Flow‐Vu (AC), Babyhaler (BH), EasyChamber (EC), and Optichamber Diamond (OD). The in vitro setup included an anatomical child throat model, Next Generation Impactor, and a breathing simulator to generate tidal breathing of a four and a 6‐year‐old child, and adult type single inhalation. Results OD showed the lowest proportion of fluticasone trapped in the throat with all breathing patterns. AC showed similar fine particle dose (FPD) in the respirable range (1–5 µm) irrespective of the breathing pattern. For BH, the median FPD 1–5 µm was highest during adult breathing. OD and EC showed higher overall DD and higher doses in the 1–5 µm range with paediatric breathing profiles compared to adult inhalation. The median DD and FPD 1–5 µm were significantly lower with BH compared to any other VHCs during tidal breathing. Compared to EC, the FPD of the other VHCs were skewed towards <2 µm particles. Conclusion Fluticasone delivery is markedly affected by breathing pattern and VHC model. The observed differences in throat deposition and FPD delivered may have significant clinical implications for side effects and controlling airway inflammation. All VHCs intended for paediatric use should undergo testing using internationally recognised standardised methods incorporating clinically relevant paediatric breathing patterns.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ojanperä et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e56395e2b3180350f00838https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27300
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1In Vitro Performance of Valved Holding Chambers in Paediatric Asthma Controller Therapy2026
  2. 2In vitro characterisation of fluticasone propionate and ciclesonide delivered with and without valved holding chambers using cascade impaction and an adult simulated breathing profile2026
  3. 3Optimizing Fluticasone Propionate and Ciclesonide pMDI Delivery: The Protective Role of Valved Holding Chambers Against Inhalation Timing Errors2025 · 1 citations
  4. 4Flow rate dependence of salbutamol dose with various valved holding chambers in vitro2026
  5. 5Inhaled salbutamol delivery in small children with disposable and reusable spacers: an in vitro study2025 · 4 citations