Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Ghana implemented various mitigating policies in response to the COVID-19 outbreak. This study examined the effectiveness of these policies to contribute to the ongoing discussions on proactive and pre-emptive interventions for similar future outbreaks. A mix of qualitative and quantitative methods were used for the analysis. Data were drawn from multiple sources, including peer-reviewed and grey literature, and academic experts from Ghanaian universities. The data from the literature informed a questionnaire that was sent to independent academic experts to explore their opinions on whether the policies met their intended objectives. The experts’ opinions were collected on a 5-point Likert scale and from an open-ended question using an online data collection platform, Qualtrics. The data were evaluated using narrative synthesis, descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. We identified and evaluated eight key COVID-19 policy responses in Ghana: (1) partial lockdown of epicentres; (2) COVID-19 public awareness campaigns; (3) ban on public gatherings; (4) COVID-19 vaccination; (5) border closures; (6) entry border COVID-19 screening; (7) incentives for healthcare workers (HCWs); and (8) the Ghana Alleviation and Revitalisation of Enterprises Support (GCARES). Two policies - the COVID-19 awareness campaigns and border closure - effectively improved public awareness of COVID-19 and helped to reduce COVID-19 case importation (median score ≥4). Ghana’s COVID-19 public awareness campaigns and border closure policies could serve as a valuable model for informing proactive interventions to address future infectious disease outbreaks.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shirley Crankson
Department of Health and Social Care
Subhash Pokhrel
Department of Health and Social Care
Nana Anokye
Brunel University of London
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Crankson et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e57fc2b6db64358751df39 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.16.24313785
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: